Showing 259 results

Archival description
CLIF/E4/1 · Item · 1866
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Marked ‘Feb. 24th | 1 o’Clock’ and ‘very well read’. Clifford won joint first prize for this paper in the English Declamation competition at Trinity in 1866.)

—————

Transcript

On the Character of Sir Walter Raleigh.

Walter Raleigh was just twenty-four years old when he sat at breakfast in the Middle Temple, one morning in the year of our Lord a thousand five hundred and seventy six. I want you to look at him with me for a little while. For himself, he sits fairly upright; his build by nature is of good style, and it has marks of external training which proclaim the soldier. He sits facing the window, which looks down upon the rows of chrysanthemums, and beyond them to the Thames. On the walls hang arms and armour; the former have tasted blood, the latter the dint of steel. Yet it does not appear that the occupant of those rooms had no thought but for the battle. There are books; the books which found favour with Oxford and Cambridge then; not after all so very different from the books which find favour with Oxford and Cambridge now. I do not remember them all; there were Horace, and Ovid, and Virgil, and the like, all mingled strangely with the stars and the four elements, the forgotten lore of our forefathers, which we will not believe in. And there was North’s Plutarch, that wonderful book of heroes, with the leaves of the life of Cæsar much bethumbed and befingered, as if he who had read therein was apt now and then to forget that he was reading, and to muse. Nor yet have we seen the whole; in a little recess on his right hand there hung a crucifix against the wall; and near it—strange mixture—were a cloak and boots and sword that seemed to have been cast off hurriedly and without care. And this led me to look more narrowly upon the soldier’s face; where were signs not easily to be mistaken, in the eye, the rough brow, the languid and ill-contented look. Indeed, Raleigh was not exactly happy that day; and he shewed it.

But I have forgotten to mention that he had two companions. One was big, strong, and burly, somewhat like himself in body; with a massive jaw and fierce cruel eyes. The other was more slight and gentle of seeming; his face was kindly, and would force you to love and obey. For indeed he seemed the incarnation of mighty world-wide power, a spirit made to rule the hearts of men, to fill vast realms of moral space. Not so the first; his was the one brute will, as the strength of an unicorn, which ever commands present and visible success.

“That was a rare trick of yours, Walter, upon Master Charles Chester last night. I shall laugh till I die at the way he tried to open his mouth, when you had fastened his chin to his upper lip. Would that the whole community of fools were served so. Aha, these are great times for the soldier, truly. The world is all in an uproar; every man’s hand is against every man, and the weakest goes to the wall. Ay, and there is gold too to be had for the having; El Dorado is the right of the strongest. Make your way here, man; be but a good soldier of fortune, and gather like spirits around you; then will we away to the West, and be successful. Condé and Coligni were good schoolmaster enough; but they knew their own interests too well to be profitable servants. Is not the battle to the strongest, there as here? Does not the big boy always get the better of the little boy? And you and I, Raleigh, we are big boys; only let us play hard, and we are sure to win. Just think how great it will be to beat that crafty Spaniard at his own weapons! He has all the gold and the power now; but how did he get it? Exactly in the way I want you to take it from him. What is his right to the Indies? Just this; that he is stronger than all these puny men who cannot keep him back. If then we are stronger than he, we shall have the greater right. Fight, man, for gold and glory; and the devil take the hindmost.”

His sharp cruel eyes looked at Raleigh for a moment with an expression of the most intense affection, the most urgent entreaty; and Raleigh’s own seemed to answer with a sympathetic gleam. But he turned round and looked enquiringly at the youth on the other side of the table.

“It seems to me, Raleigh,” said he, “that when we went to France with Champernon, to fight under Condé for the rights of Navarre, we did so because it was the right cause:”—

“And a great deal we got by it,” interrupted the other. “Remember that day when we took shelter in Walsingham’s house, when the streets were full of the shrieks of the dying, and every hour brought in more and more of the widowed and the fatherless, crying to God and to us for safety and revenge. Remember that when you talk about the Right Cause. That’s what we get by it. To the true soldier one cause is as good as another, provided it turns out well.”

“Not to the soldier of God.” Here the big man began to wince a little. “It is surely happier to fail, nay, to die, on the side of the righteous, than to ride victorious at the head of the ungodly. Not now, but far away in the future, is the victory of good; he who would do right now must look for failure, visible, seeming failure, that he may share in the glorious triumph bye and bye. Who would not rather be the meanest that fell on that day in the streets of Paris, than Charles the Tenth {1} upon his bloody throne? Let us fight to conquer the Spaniard, the oppressor of mankind; not to wrest his gold from him, not to win from him at the sword’s point the sovereignty of the Indies; but to vindicate law and right upon the earth, to succour the poor from his oppressor, and the needy from him that spoileth him. The cause that we fought for was the cause of God, and every right cause is the same. There is only one battle upon the earth, now and ever; that battle is the fight between good and evil. The powers of evil ride on exulting in their strength, and seem to conquer; far greater and nobler is the victory which is won by the slain and the captive. All through Europe and the world the oppressor is gathering together his forces to the battle, that he may hush for ever the voice of justice and mercy, the voice that sings “Excelsior!” from the summit of the mount of God.”

He stopped for a moment; the big man was uneasy, and Ralegh looked puzzled. The expression of his face seemed to say “That is all very true, and in fact I knew it before; but I don’t exactly see how it bears upon the present case.” And the other, who had apparently taken advantage of this moment to consider a little, went on.

“Ralegh, you know very well that you are a great bully, and a coward. You are exceedingly conceited because you can write verses. Altogether, you are not an estimable kind of man.” Here he paused again.

“It is true that you have fought bravely. Did you do it yourself, or did you get the strength from outside? You have been merciful and gentle. You know how that was. You have written good words, which many shall feed upon hereafter. They were not your own words. O Prophet of the Lord, betray not your inspiration to the Evil One! Here is your true crusade, clear, definite, unmistakeable. Deus id vult!”

II.

Sixteen years went by. Sixteen years; a century to the life of a cabbage; a day, to the life of an oak.

Sir Walter Raleigh was walking in the gardens of Whitehall. He was certainly changed; yet not much; you could not help thinking that the man was wider. His appearance was toned down, more polished than before; his look more settled and satisfied. He wore a cloak which had once been brave and splendid; now it was much the worse for wear; the inside of it was stained with London mud, and yet he seemed to carry it proudly. But again he was not alone; a lady walked beside him, whose like you have all seen once, perhaps twice; not often. Her eyes were of that colour which the Greeks ascribed to Athênê; not that I can define either precisely, for they seem different to different men; but I am quite sure that that colour is not blue. Of the other features, nothing more can be said than that they were not beautiful. Not, that is, if you took each separately; for grave faults could be found in all. And yet no mortal man had ever denied that she was beautiful, nor do I. And Raleigh seemed to be of the same opinion with all the rest; for though every now and again his painter’s eye would rest critically upon a fault which seemed just then to spoil the entire effect, yet some sudden expression would light up the whole into radiant harmony, and the critical spirit would make way for unreserved worship, the natural right of all that is true and beautiful.

“You are a stranger to me, Sir Walter; I have not seen you for three days.”

“The queen’s business has been urgent of late.” He seemed to speak abstractedly, and to be thinking of something else. The lady was nettled.

“You are so fond of the queen, that I do not believe you care for me at all.”

“Who would not be fond of her?” said Raleigh with enthusiasm. “She is the greatest and best monarch that ever ruled men. Has she not delivered her own people, and many other peoples beside? What glory can compare with that which comes from the protected Flemings, the defeated Armada, the worshipping English? She stands alone with her people, triumphant over tyranny and wrong; and all because she is a right royal and a noble soul. I worship the very ground she treads on.” Here he lifted a certain portion of his cloak, and kissed it.

“That is true, Sir Walter, and I love her also,” said the lady, who seemed strangely satisfied with his reply. “But then, so much of her glory is also your own. It was you that most helped to crush Don John of Austria; you that discovered Virginia, and planted the queen’s name across the sea; you that truly advised, to the great destruction of the Spanish fleet.” And in saying this she blushed a little, as if she had been sounding her own praises. “And yet all this seems to me but a fair beginning. Surely it is not yet time to rest. You, who have done so much, can do much more. Should not the Spaniard be expelled from the Indies, root and branch? Should not El Dorado:—”

But here she stopped suddenly.

Two forms, like those we saw in that chamber in the Middle Temple, had been looking on. Not now in gross human shape, but as great etherial essences, floating like clouds above the sphere of men, unseen, but working. The dark one took great volumes of unhealthy smoke and pestilent vapours of fog and miasma, which rose from the great city, to mix with the pure air of heaven. And these he spread abroad, scowling fiercely the while. Then the bright spirit came and drew them away to the West, towards the setting sun; and there he made with them a glorious sunset, a scene like those which have fired poets and painters and prophets of all kinds in all ages to do honour to the wonderful works of God. The sky swept round from the north, a rosy sea, growing brighter and brighter towards the sun; and there were islands of purple and gold, darker and yet more glorious than the golden sea. And far and far away, long past the islands of purple, long past the islands of gold, beyond the rosy sea itself, there was El Dorado, right in the centre of the sun, glowing with gold, and gold, and gold! But, just above and just below the sea, and just to the south of the sun, there were great black masses of thick darkness, pierced here and there with furnaces of fire and blood, lurid and dreadful. Yet beyond all these was the great blue deep of the ether, looking down calmly on the whole world, clear, but not fathomed.

So Raleigh exclaimed suddenly, “Mistress Throgmorton, what a magnificent sunset!”

III.

Sixteen years more, and the Tower of London. Again Sir Walter Raleigh, and again the lady; she is now no longer Mistress Throgmorton, but Lady Raleigh. And beautiful yet;—you doubt, you smile unbelievingly. Ah then, you know not what true beauty is like; you never saw it, for it seemed to you but tame, and incomplete, and faulty. That material form which you worship for itself, in itself it will die; it contains no promise of a resurrection. Know that God made beauty for the outward and visible sign of the indwelling soul; it is one of the many tongues wherein He inspires men to teach their fellows. And to those who can read that language the beauty of man or woman is the beauty in which they will rise again! No wonder then that it is far above the reach of time; no wonder; for it shall last eternity.

And Raleigh, what of him? He bears the marks of those sixteen years, and they are deep marks. But his wounds are all in front. He has chosen the good cause, the cause of present failure, of final and glorious success. That motto which inspired his maiden sword has guided him on and on. Finem det mihi virtus. {2} So the old hero has the marks of his greatness about him; a greatness so vast, so imposing, that it is not even safe to let the crowd gaze upon him, lest they should catch the infection, and become great themselves. “Non sufficit orbis” said the proud Spaniard of his brute dominion, glorying in the plenitude of his material power; how low down he sinks when we weigh him against this mighty soul! Non sufficit orbis; no; the world’s tyrant is too small an enemy for him.

But what made him so great? Was it the expedition to Guiana, that great victory of justice and mercy, that blow to the Spanish power? Or was it the fight at Cadiz, the victory of true valour, the great overthrow of the oppressor? Or was it those years of private glory, when all men spoke well of him at home but those who would have stood immediately in his path? No, it was none of these. It was the long twelve years in the Tower of London; when all his schemes were foiled, when he was getting poorer and poorer every day, when the nation was falling down, down, far away from its high ideal, when the conquered Spaniard was repairing his losses by craft, and was helped by the very monarch who sat upon the English Throne; then, when all things looked blackest, and the evil one began to glory in his triumph and to say “I have conquered in the battle; with mine own arm have I gained this victory, and who is he that shall take it from me?”; then was the soul of Raleigh growing fast and faster to the full and perfect stature of a prophet of the Highest; preparing with painful discipline for that day when at last all hindrances should be overthrown, and he should go forth in freedom of spirit to fight the battle of the Lord.

Well, the twelve years were nearly over, and the refiner’s fire had all but done its work. Raleigh sat by a table, with a pen in his hand; a manuscript lay before him; it was the History of the World. Not finished, indeed; no good work of man ever is finished, for then it would cease to be good. All that we do here is worth only its incompleteness, only its promise of something to follow. So the History of the World was unfinished, and destined to remain so. And Raleigh looked up to his wife, who had watched him musingly as he wrote. “Oh husband,” she said, “I dreamt that you and I and Walter and Carew were all in El Dorado together, and that we sent home a whole shipload of gold for the people.”

I would shew you Raleigh once more; but I have not the eye of the eagle that can look the sun in the face. The battle of good and evil is going on still upon the earth; and it often seems to us as if the righteous side were losing ground. Then it is good for us to remember that the armies which we see with our mortal eyes are not the only combatants that are engaged in the fight; that besides the host of the Syrians, the enemies of Israel, that surround the mount, there is also the unseen army that defends us, so that they are more with us than with them. Ever above the clang of human contest, the hosts of light and darkness are warring in the clouds; nay, rather, in the thickest of the earthly fight. And when any of us is hard pressed, and seemingly at the mercy of the foe; then are we covered by the shields of the immortals, or caught up in a cloudy mist out of the hand of the enemy. In that great army of the twelve legions is the old soldier of England fighting still; from that Dorado does he send fine gold to his people who are still in the old country; now, more than ever, is that glorious motto true, Non sufficit orbis.

“But,” some will say, “that scene in the Tower was not the end of his life; you cannot reconcile this with what came afterwards.”

Know then, all ye who doubt, that the death of the Saints is enveloped in thick darkness, which seems to cover all the earth, and to hide even the face of God. And in this they grope about as blind men for awhile, suffering more than in all their lives before. But for those who have thus suffered there is needed no further purification; for the hour of death draws away the veil of darkness, and frees them to fulfil their glorious destiny. {3}

But what destiny?

Fighting still; on the same side, with the same objects, against the same foes. Now, as then, there is just in front of us a Dorado, meant for the good of all men, the gift of Him Who sends rain upon the just and upon the unjust. The student of science lives in the consciousness that at any moment that may be revealed to him which shall change utterly the whole face of society, and alleviate in an enormous degree the physical miseries of mankind. And now, as then, there is the danger lest that which is meant for the good of all should be perverted into an instrument of evil; lest, after all, the only result should be that another portion of conquered Nature is cursed for the sake of man.

Again: it is just as true now as it was then, that religion is impeded by her golden slippers. The political relations of Christianity have rent Christendom, and thrown doubt upon the Faith; they have furnished a religious pretext for the foulest of crimes.—

Ahi Constantin, di quanto mal fu matre,
Non la tua conversion, ma quelta dote
Che da te prese il primo ricco patre!

Let no man think that ecclesiastical oppression is dead, because it has advanced in refinement with the age. It is true that we have emancipated ourselves from the rule of the Western Patriarch; it is also true that we use our independence to define that which Christendom has never defined, and to condemn those whom Christendom has never condemned. The Twelve Legions are fighting hard for the reunion of the Churches; but they are also fighting against tyranny and wrong. Not by their help will that Union be effected, if it is to be nothing else than a conspiracy for the oppression of mankind. If then we want a definite cause, a crusade of righteousness to fight for; let us fight on the side of Raleigh and the Host of Heaven against intolerance and oppression, and brute force; so only shall we be fighting for the Faith, the freedom and the unity of Christians.

+W:K:C:

—————

Marked at the head in pencil ‘Feb. 24th | 1 o’Clock’. Docketed in pencil ‘Declamation’ and, above, ‘very well spoken’. Note the variation in the spelling of Raleigh’s name.

{1} ‘IXth’ has been added in pencil in the margin.

{2} Followed by ‘“I fight for the right and the true’ struck through in ink, and ‘“True and Righteous is the Issue”’ struck through in pencil.

{3} Followed by a cancelled paragraph, as follows: ‘“But the cause was bad;” say others. Raleigh fought for a false faith, against the Faith of Christ; how then is he a saint?”’

CLIF/A1/1 · Item · 20 Aug. 1864
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Trinity College, Cambridge.—Was sorry to hear of Uncle John’s death. Hopes Kitty (his sister) was not hurt much by the swing. Has heard from Mr Heywood and seen Tovey. Romilly has died.

—————

Transcript

Coll: SS: Trin: Cantab:
Aug: 20/64

My dear Papa and Mama

I was very sorry and surprised to hear of poor Uncle John’s death. It is no wonder that you are not well. You say he was well enough the Saturday before to go to Starcross {1} and stay with Aunt Lizzie. Is it not very like what one has heard of the flicker of a candle before it goes out? I remember having noticed it in other cases. It must be a consolation to think that he had no suffering during the week, and was conscious so long. And, if I may say anything of this kind, ought we to think that the mercy which we should ourselves accord can be greater than the Infinite mercy? It seems to take away all the benefit of the Incarnation, if the Compassion of our Lord is not at least as great as that of men.

I do hope dear little Kitty was not much hurt by the swing. I know it can knock very hard, because Clement hurt his knee there very much once. I have been scratching myself in bathing. About a fortnight ago I knocked my elbow against a rough post in diving, but it is nearly well now.

I have heard from Mr Heywood, who was in Paris on the 13th, and seems to be enjoying himself. Mrs Heywood is with him, and he says they have had delightful weather. I saw Tovey in a boat last night. You will see by the Paper that Mr Romilly, one of our Dons, has just died {2}.

Please to give my love to Mitchell, and say I hope he has not lost the opportunity of making interesting experiments as to the nature of physical pain. It is such a waste of trouble if he has.

With best love to all the little ones, and hopes that you are much better, believe me to remain

your very affectionate son
+W: K: Clifford.

P:S: I have at last borrowed a machine for mending pens, and my writing is rapidly improving under its influence. You should see the two awful tables of the Inequalities of the Moon’s Radius Vector and Longitude, which I have to read over every day, so as to get them by heart.

—————

On the back of the letter are two addresses in an unidentified hand: ‘W | 59 Cannon St | London’ (‘City’ struck through before ‘London’), and ‘2 Elm Grove | New North Rd’. The latter is an address in Exeter.

{1} A village in Devon, eight miles south-east of Exeter.

{2} Joseph Romilly died of heart failure on 7 August, while on holiday at Great Yarmouth.

CLIF/A2/1 · Item · late Oct. 1874?
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Place of writing not indicated.)—Thanks her for her long letter. Discusses arrangements for going to a play, and refers to his negotiations about the house. Mrs Sitwell has invited them to tea. Points out that they only need to understand each other to agree on what is important, and refers to his loneliness since losing ‘the only mind that had really grown up with my own’ (Crotch). Discusses in detail his views on Christianity.

(This letter was written some time between Crotch’s death on 16 June 1874 and Clifford's marriage on 7 Apr. 1875. The Sunday lecture referred to may have been ‘Body and Mind’, read before the Sunday Lecture Society on 1 Nov. 1874.)

—————

Transcript

20 pages! you sweet child—and a little bit over—all along of my telling you about my Sunday talks. First, thank you, darling, for sending me the Gibbon; though Sir Fred would not have minded waiting till I have taken my house, and then there would have been less to carry across. Next, I have secured miladi and Moss—Walter being away at his sweetheart’s—to go to the play with us tomorrow; and we are to dine there at 6 if I telegraph to that effect tomorrow morning after seeing you: because, as I said, uomo propone, donna dispone. Also I have written to the agent that my medical adviser Dr Corfield will come with me to inspect the house on Thursday, and asked if in the event of my taking it for 3 or more years the proprietor will either decrease the rent or let my holding commence at Xtmas. We must arrange somehow that you go and see your aunt while we elect members from 5 to 6, and then we must meet again somewhere. Have we made any arrangement about Sunday afternoon? Mrs Sitwell wants us to go to tea with her after my lecture. {1} She says she has met you and apologizes for the irregularity of the invitation, but will make a formal call first if you wish it. She has been working like a slave at the working women’s college and other excellent works.

Your letter made me very happy, darling; it is quite clear we only want to understand each other to agree on everything that is important; as for mere speculative opinions it is far better to have something left to discuss. You can’t conceive how lonely I have felt since I lost the only mind that had really grown up with my own; we never agreed upon results, but we always used the same method with the same object, which is much better. {2} It is only lately that I have seen other faces near me through the fog; have recognized how vast is the army that is all going the same way, and how rapidly the enemy is disappearing, though he does not know it. Now you won’t have time to read this tomorrow morning, but still I shall talk over one or two points.

First, a very small one. Your theory about the unconfessed feeling that the divine origin of Xt may be true, is not so far as I know a fact. It is of course very hard to realize that other people do actually honestly disbelieve what we believe ourselves; but no man that I know who has rejected Xtianity on moral grounds (and I know few men who have not) ever shews the slightest sign of such a doubt as you speak of, though I have had most confidential talks with a great many. There is, as you say, a vagueness about the character of Xt, a want of some definite action which can be called good or bad, which makes the ideal of him as exceedingly good to be more persistent when one has got it. But cutting away the impossible stories, and supposing some basis of truth in the healing of nervous diseases by strong excitement, one can say of him a little less than of Buddha, a little more than of Chrishna; nothing at all approaching to the definite heroism of Socrates, or Spinoza, or Mazzini. Buddha was an actual prince who left his throne to study the woes of poor people and find remedies for them; Chrishna stole cows, instead of killing pigs, that belonged to other people. These two claimed, like Christ, a supernatural mission, and worked miracles according to the earliest accounts we have. Why should I, a Teuton, hanker after one of these foreigners rather than the other? the Hindus are nearer to me by blood than the Jew; one has as many, the other twice as many followers, as he.

This is for me, who have ceased to believe in the supernatural goodness of Jesus. I fought hard for it; perhaps now have not courage to bear another such wrench as the losing of it gave me. But for you, darling, who still have that belief, keep it; a person of whom we really know so little is perhaps the safest sort of figure to clothe with your ideal. Only make up your mind that an increasing number of thoughtful people do sincerely think that person unworthy of your ideal.

But now let us admit that the rule of life which you read into the Gospels (as my friend Syed Ahmed Khan {3} reads all manner of enlightened things into the Koran) is really there; and even that Jesus is still alive and can hear you and help you carry it out. Then you say “won’t it be a good thing if some good is done for his sake that would not be done for the sake of ordinary men, out of sympathy and comradeship? And is it not quite natural and likely that he should have set apart certain men to preach this same doctrine, and have given them some of the same wonderful power?”

Here are two sets of things. 1. An excellent rule of life, and devotional affection for a certain person. 2. The substitution of the theological for the social motive, and the honouring of a set of men supposed to possess magical powers. The latter seem to follow naturally from the former; are they not then right things to do?

If the experiment had never been made, one might well answer, let us try. But the experiment has been made, at the cost of centuries of blood and fire and misery. If you love your brother for the sake of somebody else who is very likely to damn your brother, it soon comes to burning him alive for his soul’s health. That doesn’t seem likely, but it’s an observed fact. No Christian ecclesiastical body has ever had the power to persecute without using it. (It was once objected to me that some Quakers in Pennsylvania had the chance of persecuting their Indian servants and didn’t. But the Quakers have no clergy.) Before the clergy were recognized by the state they had destroyed the national sentiment all over the empire, and had sapped the foundations of social life with monasticism and the “theological motive.” Afterwards they got the hospitals suppressed and the physicians banished; substituting places where a martyr’s toe was brought to cure you, in a silver box. They shut up the philosophical & scientific schools. They they quarelled†. Ten million men were killed in the religious wars of Justinian and by the plagues which the relics were unable to stop. They suppressed all freedom of thought and therefore all progress. They respected not even the name of truth; for those frauds were called “pious” whose object was the honour of the Church. They reduced all Europe to a black night of barbarism which Greece had not known for two thousand years. And then when the light came, when the Teutons rose against her crimes and the Arabs exposed her falsehoods, the Church fought desperately over every inch of ground against the new civilization that was growing up; not only in Catholic but in Protestant countries. Even now the clergy howl against every new truth that is discovered, because the law will let them do nothing worse. They hinder the education of children, except in their own formulæ, knowing well that a straight conscience and a free-grown intellect will neither believe in their doctrines nor approve their precepts. There is the result of a fairly long experiment on the theological motive and the sacerdotal principle. If you put your hand in the fire and burn it tomorrow, and somebody comes on Thursday and says “see how nice and warm the fire is when your hand is outside; don’t you think it will be nicer and warmer if you put it in?” would you follow that person’s advice? The priesthood has destroyed one civilization. It has just failed to strangle another in its birth; and it is the bounden duty of every honest man to see that it shall never have another chance.

Well now, suppose that Christ is responsible for this; that he did knowingly let loose the Xtian clergy upon Europe. Then I say that no amount of diligence in preaching the Rabbis’ good precepts, no cure of some hundred or so paralytics and madmen in Palestine, can outweigh the atrocity of that awful crime. But if he is really alive now, was innocent, as I believe, of making priests, and represents your ideal; do you think his indignation is less against the “generation of vipers” than it was at Jerusalem? The language is strong, perhaps; the men are good in many respects, well-meaning; they only profess a little magic. All the more should our blood boil against the Institution that puts good men to such vile uses.

So, when our souls look back to thee
They sicken, seeing against thy side,
Too foul to speak of or to see
The leprous likeness of a bride,
Whose kissing lips through his lips grown
Leave their God rotten to the bone. {4}

There’s a sermon for you! Poor little thing, there is one comfort, that you won’t read it. Farewell, my own child; I shall see you at 11 tomorrow.

Willi.

—————

{1} The lecture was perhaps ‘Body and Mind’, read before the Sunday Lecture Society on 1 November 1874.

{2} Frederick Pollock (Lectures and Essays, i. 16) identified these words as referring to G. R. Crotch, who died at Philadelphia on 16 June 1874.

{3} Clifford presumably met Ahmad Khan when he visited England in 1869 and 1870.

{4} This is the thirtieth stanza of Swinburne’s poem ‘Before a Crucifix’.

† Sic.

CLIF/A6/1 · Item · 24 Mar. 1879
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

33 Woodsome Road, Highgate Road, N.W.—Communicates the London Dialectical Society's regret at the death of Professor Clifford.

(Letter-head of the Society. Signed as Honorary Secretary.)

—————

Transcript

33 Woodsome Rd
Highgate Rd
NW
March 24/79

Madam

It is my mournful duty to send you a copy of the following resolution which was unanimously passed at a meeting of the Society held on the 19th inst.

“That this Society desires to express its deep regret at the loss sustained by the Nation through the untimely death of Profr Clifford the honored president of this Society: and tenders its sincere condolence to Mrs Clifford in her sad bereavement.”

I am
Yours very respectfully
Robt G. Hember
Hon Sec

Mrs Clifford

CLIF/E2/1 · Item · 1860s
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(This essay was probably written while Clifford was an undergraduate at Trinity.)

—————

Transcript

De statu scientiarum, quod non sit fœlix aut majorem in modum auctus; quodque alia omnino quam prioribus cognita fuerit via aperienda sit intellectui humano, et alia comparanda auxilia, ut meus suo jure in rerum naturam uti possit.

Bacon has an inconvenient habit of using old technical terms in entirely new senses, and of giving particular senses to general words which appear to have not the least connection with their ordinary meanings. For instance:—Form, Induction, Idol. We have other instances in the passage quoted above. “Scientiæ” does not mean a collection of facts or laws, but is more subjective, in accordance with the etymology. “Fœlix”, if affirmative, would mean that the sciences were easy, without inconvenient hitches and things hard to be understood. And “majorem in modum auctus” does not mean merely “increased” or “greatly advancing”, but denotes such an increase as changes the whole aspect of the science, or of some branch of it. In other words, it is a development of form and not of magnitude. The first clause, then, means that the sciences are perplexed with much the same general difficulties as they have been all along; that there has been no great clearing, which opened a wide surface to the feet of all walkers; and that this state of things is very unsatisfactory. In this sense we say that the clause is applicable to the present time. Admitting that the sciences generally are increased, that particular discoveries have been made, and the mechanical arts vastly improved—and indeed it could hardly be otherwise; admitting also, that the {1} state of certain particular branches of science has been auctus majorem in modum; we say that it still remains true, quod status scientiarum non sit majorem in modum auctus. There are still difficulties, and cramped methods; things do not flow on easily, except in some particular examples. Bacon’s idea of utilis inventio is not one that can be applied to mechanical arts (for there have been plenty of them), but one one that is ad generandum valida, capable of producing its like. For instance, the Chemical spectrum has already been the parent of many important discoveries, and there is no limit to the facts and laws which any one may discover by its means. Bacon’s method must be something general which corresponds to this special instance, and Induction, according to the common idea of the same, may have nothing whatever to do with it.

—————

Docketed by Clifford in ink ‘De Stato … | W K Clifford’, and by a later hand in pencil ‘Cambridge | early.’

{1} ‘the sciences … that the’: these three lines are marked in the margin with a vertical line and the comment ‘very good observn’. The comment probably relates specifically to the phrase ‘that particular discoveries … improved’.

CLIF/A8/1 · Item · 7 Apr. 1876
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Athenaeum Club, Pall Mall.—Encloses a cheque for the Clifford fund.

(With an envelope.)

—————

Transcript

Athenæum Club, Pall Mall
7th April 1876

Dear Mr Pollock—I enclose cheque (£5) for the Conspiracy Fund. I would do the same over again if a fresh application is found necessary. I am very glad that the thing has been undertaken and think that nothing too much can be done that may tend to the preservation of so valuable a life.

Believe me,
Yours very truly
J. J. Sylvester

[Direction on envelope:] F. Pollock Esqr | 12 Bryanston St | Portman Square | W

—————

The envelope was postmarked at London, S.W., and London, W., on 7 April 1876, and is marked ‘Sylvester’ in a later hand.

CLIF/A3/1 · Item · 1869
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Cambridge.)—Cannot get away from Cambridge before Friday. Alludes to various theological doctrines relating to the body of Christ.

(Undated. Marked ‘1869’.)

—————

Transcript

Union Society, Cambridge

Dear Fred

can’t fix it nohow to get a way† from Cambridge before Friday afternoon. Awfully sorry. The universe physical moral and spiritual has been execrated; in vain. I know “sicut in loco” {1} was condemned by the council of Trent; and think oculus saltem glorificatus {2} means only hyperæsthesia which is well known as a disease of the celestials. Will read S. Th. again on 1st opportunity. The Capernaite views {3} made it necessary to give distinct denials to several absurdly material doctrines, and the denials were afterwards made to mean more. Thus the refinement you mention of the harmless remark that “no man hath seen God at any time” into “the Divine essence is per se beyond human perceptive faculties”.

Yours ever
W.K.C.

—————

{1} Cf. Aquinas, Summa Theologica, III. 76. 5: ‘corpus Christi non est in hoc sacramento sicut in loco, sed per modum substantiae: eo scilicet modo quo substantia continetur a dimensionibus’ (‘the body of Christ is not in this sacrament as in a place, but in the manner of a substance, that is, in the manner in which a substance is contained by dimensions’).

{2} oculus saltem glorificatus. i.e. ‘the specially glorified eye.’ Cf. Summa Theologica, I. 12. 3: ‘Ergo oculus glorificatus potest videre Deum’ (‘Therefore the glorified eye can see God’).

{3} i.e. the views of those who believe in transubstantiation.

† Sic.

CLIF/D1/1 · Item · c. 1865
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

The contents are as follows:

‘Pythian II.’ Notes relating to a lecture on Pindar’s second Pythian Ode, with an incomplete annotated translation.

‘Plato & Co(pe).’ Notes relating to a lecture on Plato’s Phaedrus.

Notes on precession and nutation, the motion of the earth, etc., relating to lectures by [E. J.] Routh.

‘Hamilton’s Principle.’

‘Hayward’s Planetary Theory.’

‘On a Geometrical Theory applicable to Floating Bodies. (Metacenter.)’

‘Adams on Secular Acc[eleratio]n of [the Moon]’s Mean Motion.’

‘Rotation of the Moon. (Stuart, fr[om] Laplace)’

‘Theory of Jupiter’s Satellites. (Laplace).’

‘Inspiration.’

‘Enlightened Tolerance.’ First paragraph of a paper later entitled ‘On Toleration and Free Thought’ (see below).

‘Πειθω.’ A poem.

‘A Treatise on the Bottom of the Sea; to which are added Reflexions on the Interpretation of Prophecy.’ Draft of a paper (read before the Parallelepiped Society, 11 May 1865).

‘Τροτηρής, or On Style.’

‘The Mystery of Melancholy.’

‘On Toleration and Free Thought.’ Partial draft of a paper (read before the Parallelepiped Society, 9 Nov. 1865).

‘Of Cowper.’

Untitled essay on the relation between science and theology.

Notes on the question ‘Is the notion of obligation an essential part of morality?’

Notes on the question ‘Why is there so much more difference between man & anthropoid apes than the physical organisms seem to account for?’

‘How definitions are a source of ignorance.’

Notes on the question ‘Can the doctrine of Final Causes be reconciled with Religion?’

‘Eirenicon Magnum.’ Syllabus and draft of a paper (apparently intended to be read before the Parallelepiped Society).

—————

Transcript of ff. A1–A17

A Treatise on the Bottom of the Sea; | to which are added | Reflexions on the Interpretation of Prophecy.

It will be at once perceived that the subject of this paper is twofold. The twin themes, however, which are mentioned in the Title, will not be treated separately, one after the other; but on account of their intimate connection will walk on hand in hand, as dear children; while the author, like some breezy nursemaid, will follow with the perambulator, flirting with the casual policeman, nor, for all that, untouched by the glory of our national defences. He thinks, at the same time, that it would not ill become him to give some account of the reasons which have induced him to bring these two subjects in particular before the notice of the Parallelepiped. And to begin with the Bottom of the Sea. It is evidently unnecessary that he should speak of the mysterious interest of this subject considered in itself; of the vast fleets of Tarshish that lie there in silence, each with its Jonah on board, holding their secrets quietly, undisturbed by the distant murmur of supernal storms; of the home of the great sea-serpent, whose nose, we hope, is soon to be put out of joint by a snake of more slender construction; of all those awful monsters, which, by a long process of emigration have finally been sent to the only place where their existence cannot be disproved. It was indeed a priori obvious that the subject of the Bottom of the Sea was one of the deepest interest. But, apart from the subject considered merely by itself, the author proposes here to treat of all those connected fields of inquiry which arise naturally from such consideration of it. For instance: the use of Poetry in Education; the Present Position of the Parallelepiped; the Attic Orator and the English Sermonizer compared & contrasted; Fiction; Reviews; Mendelssohn; and the Philosophy of Discovery. It is much to be regretted that want of time and material rendered it impossible to add a projected Appendix on the Doctrine of Limits. If it were possible to add anything to the intense interest of the theme, this Appendix would have done so; and its loss is the more to be regretted, as the preceding list will doubtless have created in the mind of my audience the most lively curiosity in respect of everything connected with the Bottom of the Sea. And indeed if the mere consideration of this mysterious subject can solve all the knotty points that have been raised in the discussion of the matters just mentioned, with far greater ease than a Davenport brother can slip out of the toils of the half-hitch; surely then it may be allowed to blow its own trumpet in the face of the Parallelepiped, nor can anybody complain if the whole thing is done in the dark.

These then are some of the reasons which have induced me to treat of the Bottom of the Sea; but why, it may be asked, should I talk about the Interpretation of Prophecy also? The answer is easy. The two subjects are so closely connected, that it is impossible to speak of one without speaking also of the other. This will be obvious to anyone who remembers what was said about Jonah, Sea-serpent, Electric Telegraph, and Ships of Tarshish. I dash therefore in medias res; that is to say, I go down the Maëlstrom strapped to an empty cask; come on, who’s afraid?

The use of Poetry in Education is the first field that opens before us. Man has been defined as the animal that beats its young systematically for educational ends. From this it might be argued, and justly, that the educational ends of men correspond to that portion of the sea of which I am treating. This I mention quite by the way, and merely to show the connected nature of my argument.

Education, then, is a beating. And this truth is not confined to the Education of the young, teste Tennyson:—

“At the last arose the man,
⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕
To shape and use.”

Now that which is beaten, is beaten that it may go. I know indeed that a far different philosophy is taught by the nameless Homer of English nursery rhyme, when he says:—

“If I had a donkey and he wouldn’t go,
Wouldn’t I wollop him? no, no, no!”

But I think it will be apparent to every reflecting mind that in this place the poet has fallen into the error of those who mistake indulgence for benevolence, and drop substantial justice to grasp at the shadow of generosity. He was doubtless an advocate for the abolition of capital punishment, and would have turned a deaf ear to the confession of Constance Kent.

I have also to refute another school of philosophers, who say that education is not the making of a man to go, but the development of that which is in him; just as a gardener attends to the development of a plant, seeing that it fulfils in every respect the law of its nature, and does not get crooked. This they say is the education of the plant; like to this is the education of a man. And they support their pernicious view by arguments based on the derivation of the word itself. But this ground I can easily cut away from under them. For I hold it an axiom far too sublime for proof, that every really useful word in the English Language was at some time or other the last new piece of University Slang. And this being so, who shall say that this word Education was not coined and invented by a Mathematical man ignorant of Latin Prepositions? Therefore the education of man is rather like unto that care of the gardener which through bitter discipline of hothouse, and pruning-knife, and tobacco-smoke, transforms the dog-rose of the hedges into damask and cloth of gold. Q:E:D:. We have then arrived at the following definition:—

“Education is that kind of beating which makes men go.”

I am too sleepy to take every point in the order in which I mentioned it before. As my state is immediately and forcibly suggestive of sermons, I will proceed at once with that subject.

⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕

Dear me! I am awake again, and will narrate my dream, as it was apropos of the present discussion.

Methought that I stood in the midst among many people; and it was indeed Saint Bartholomew’s Fair. Then I held up on high a prize to be contended for; it was a garment of white stuff, very pure and precious, and the sleeves and the collar thereof were edged with curious workmanship. So I swore that I would give it to what noble knight soever should win it in fair rivalry; not indeed for himself, but to present unto his ladie love. And the manner of contending should be this; each one should bring a donkey, and call him by his own name; then each should ride on other’s donkey, and the donkey that came in last should win for his owner the prize. So they came together to contend. And I saw in my dream how they did smite the asses, some upon the head, and some upon the neck, and some upon the back; and others did prog† them with the ends of their sticks. But for all this the asses would not move but a small space, and one moved not at all. He that rode thereon so flourished his stick with grace and precision that he caused among many that were looking on great admiration and fluttering of heart, so that the very ass himself seemed not insensible to the charms of the Sublime and Beautiful; yet for all this he would not stir. And This† ass was the one that won the prize at the last. Then I saw in my dream, and one of the riders did lean forward and whisper into the ear of his ass; and he said “Beans.” He did likewise bite the ear. Then did the beast in a great fury run forward, and became a pulpit cushion; so I awoke, and remembered that saying of Tully’s, that one orator will persuade men, while another will make a neat and appropriate speech.

COR: 1. Oratory is a certain kind of beating which makes men go.
COR: 2. Therefore Oratory may be a part of Education.

I have thus connected Sermons with Education and therefore with the Bottom of the Sea. But their sphere of connection has really a far larger radius. There are certain things, viz: Music, Painting, Sculpture, Architecture, which we are wont to class with Oratory & Poetry under the common name of Art. With these we ought also to put all that kind of Prose which lives; this term suffices to exclude Literary Criticism, of which I promise to speak presently. Now, what is the common property which causes all these things to be grouped together? why are they one? The answer to this question will constitute a definition of Art. There are some, indeed, who doubt altogether whether these things have any common property; the end of such men is destruction. Again there are those who assert that the common property consists in their being all the domain of taste and appealing to our notions of the Sublime and Beautiful. All I have to say to the Parallelepiped about these men is a word of solemn warning against their impious and heretical doctrines. Art is that by which one man persuades another. To illustrate in some measure this sublime and incontrovertible truth, I will quote from another poet.

“But I think, when years have floated onward
⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕ ⁕
Left a message for his weary soul.”

And again:—

“I struck one chord of music
Like the sound of a great Amen.
… It linked all perplexed meanings
into one perfect peace
and trembled away into silence
as if it were loth to cease.”

But this theory of Art can do more than support itself; it can take us in safety to the Bottom of the Sea. For I apprehend that this question “what is the origin of our belief?” is about as near to the Bottom of the Sea as any question can be. Now of all our ideas, and beliefs, and theories, one of two things must be predicable; either they were born with us, or we have acquired them since. And the ideas which we have acquired since may again be subdivided into two classes; those which we found out for ourselves, so to speak; and those of which we have been persuaded by our fellow-men. There remaineth therefore these three, Birth, Sight, {1} and Persuasion; and the greatest of these is Persuasion. Trust me, Opinion is a stormy sea; but Persuasion is at the Bottom of it. There sits Πειθω, on a throne of pearls and coral, far down in the blue depths beyond the ken of men; and all things do obeisance to her.

But I pass on to speak of Prophecy. It is indeed a comfort, to one entering upon a theme like this, to know that religious discussions are not tabooed in our society; nay rather, have received the especial patronage and protection of our revered Founder. I will therefore discourse diligently and without fear.

A prophet, I take it, is one inspired. This does not mean that he is infallible; on the contrary his very inspiration shews where his faults are. If the Sun gave no light, what should we know of Solar Spots? Further; the Spirits of the prophets are subject unto the prophets; Inspiration is a thing perceptible to its subject, and controlled by him. Again, a prophet knows not the interpretation of his prophecy; this is the office of other men. To some are given divers kinds of tongues; to others the interpretation of tongues. And lastly, which tallies well with the third, to those that have ears to hear, the words of the prophet are clearer and more precise than those of ordinary men. This is all I can say without divulging in some measure what my paper is about. And (which is lucky) this is just all which it is necessary to believe concerning prophecy. If any receive not these doctrines, let him bethink himself of the Acherontic Combustion of the Sempiternal Tartarus, and pause ere it be too late.

Whosoever can persuade men is a prophet. Carlyle assents. All Art is talismanic and thaumaturgic, for it can persuade men.

“Trust me, no new skill of subtle tracery
No mere practice of a dexterous hand
Will suffice, without a hidden spirit
That we may, or may not, understand.”

It is necessary, before all things, to believe in the Divinity of Πειθω.

But specially, the poet is a prophet.

“I told
a prophecy; poetic numbers came
spontaneously to clothe in priestly robe
a renovated spirit singled out,
such hope was mine, for holy services.”

Now, it was not long ago that I asked the question, whether Tennyson would live? And I was answered “Not among vulgar minds, perhaps; but he will always be a favourite with men of taste.” In the name of poetic inspiration I denounce this doctrine. A poet is the Persuader of men, the favourite of heaven; his office is to feed a hungry multitude, not to tickle the palates of the Epicurean Few. If it does chance that the heavenly manna is in taste like unto coriander seed, exceeding sweet and pleasant: still it is the food of the people, and not a relish for the dessert of Dives. Far be it from poetry to become an allegory of French Chocolate. {2}

Just because he is specially inspired, the Poet is specially Ποιητης. He above all artists has that creative power which alone can work miracles. And observe what he creates; not poems or stories or ideas that exist in themselves, but the minds of men. Cut him off from this his influence, you cut off the air he breathes; it is a King dethroned with a pension of five thousand a-year. He must persuade, or he is no poet.

Nor is he bound to understand his own prophecy. Therefore to one who says that Shakespeare wrote a Trilogy of Roman History, it is no answer that “he could not possibly have meant to”; because that has nothing to do with the matter. And if my Conception of “the Voyage” seems totally different from yours, it is only because the poet used a language far more perfect than the one in which we tell our thoughts to each other. Depend upon it, the latter is in fault; that prophecy is perfectly definite & clear; I have read it exactly as you have. Nay more; it has given you a far clearer notion of the periodicity of History than I possibly can:—

“The world is round
and we may sail for ever more”

and, where Argument failed, “the Brook” has convinced you of the permanence of human nature:—

“For men may come, and men may go,
But I go on for ever.”

Songs without Words have all the clearer meaning; for it is in the Words of our description, and not in the notes, that the ambiguity lies. Surely the authority of Mendelssohn will suffice to establish this point.

If the artist’s work were his own, it would be good to publish all that remains of a great man. But because his greatness is not of himself, it is not always with him, he does not always obey it; and then he fails. He learns only by degrees and in a long time to put quiet confidence in his own inspiration; by this growing faith he is gradually justified and made perfect. “Non nobis, Domine!” is the final attainment of a perfect soul. We can trace the approach to it in many a lofty life. Some wear Saul’s armour all their time, and will not see the smooth pebbles that are waiting for them in the brook. So Goliath goes on, and defies the armies of Israel. “I cannot wear these, for I have not proved them”; this is what the hero says, when you talk to him about the via media, and dangerous extremes. So says also the poet, when you bid him be careful of his style. “My clothes shall be made to fit me; here, Snip, take my measure.”

But though the poet is not infallible, yet is he trustworthy. For his reason he may be adduced as inspired testimony in all questions of this sort; for if what he says is a part of his message, it is true. Only on this principle can I justify the overwhelming number of quotations in this paper. To each of them belongs this preface: γεγραπται. {3}

I have spoken at this length of poetry, because it is the clearest instance of a theory which applies to all kinds of Art. All is inspired; all persuades men. But see, if this be so, how utilitarian Art becomes. It is no longer a thing of taste, meant to give a refined pleasure to those whose education fits them to appreciate it; Art is the Educator itself; the heavenly motive power that makes men go. Here is a most neat and commodious building; it accomodates† twenty thousand people, and seats them all in the sublimest comfort; everybody can hear, and it only cost. … Well, here again is a small Church, which cost five or six times the money, and won’t hold nearly as many people; and when they are there, they will be sitting on benches, or kneeling on knife-boards, or standing on Minton’s Tiles, and getting sore-throats. But did your commodious galleries ever raise a high and a holy thought in those who looked round upon the stuccoed lies of that whited sepulchre? Did the Mother-Maid over the altar ever look down with loving eyes upon the orphan, to teach him that he had two Mothers in Heaven? Ah! if that fresco cost more than all your fine house put together, it was worth fifty times the money, only for doing so much for the little ones. True Art is true utility for ever.

The various forms of Art are only the different tongues of the dwellers at Jerusalem; devout men out of every nation under Heaven. But as each prophet has his special gift of inspiration, so each hearer his special appreciation. Nor was Plato wrong, who saw many steps, as the nails hang in order from a magnet. The nail next in contact is the Critic. His office also is made for him, and he for it; the censer is holy, but men fill it with unhallowed fire. No prophecy of Art is of any private interpretation; He Who sent the prophet, sent also his true expounders, the false Critic only proves the existence of the true.

Once more. Archimedes, like Socrates, has his Dæmon. Science also is Art, and falls from heaven. The two great ideas that have transformed geometry came, not to the savant surrounded by all the resources of analysis and well up in all the discoveries of his day, but to the captive who drew figures on the walls of his Russian Prison. All your Novum Organon, your Methods of Discovery, nay even the great Induction itself, are but as the chariots and the horses of Egypt. Science is only divine. But it is also human. Bear a little with my idealism when I say that we all see through a glass darkly, through the glass of our own nature; and the universe that we look at seems to partake of the colour of the glass. Your theory of nature, to be true to humanity, must also be coloured as the glass; it must persuade men. Nay farther; all you have to do is to wipe each man’s glass for him. Truly Science is a very human thing.

I have been to the Bottom of the Sea of Art; I have made it out to be a Prophecy that Persuades Men. This is all that my paper is about; so we have got back to the surface, away from the Policemen and the Parks, at the End of the Donkey-race. May nobody ever get to the bottom of the Parallelepiped; but may each succeeding Thursday see the bottom of the well-drained Pewter.

—————

This paper was read before the Parallelepiped Society on 11 May 1865, and the text was copied by Clifford, with a few variations, into the Society’s Minute Book (O.11.6, vol. ii, ff. 56-68), the spelling of ‘Reflexions’ in the title being changed to ‘Reflections’.

{1} Commas supplied after ‘Birth’ and ‘Sight’. Both are in the Minute Book version.

{2} ‘Its greatest good is to be wholesome and nutritious.’ struck through.

{3} On the facing page is written in pencil: ‘Plat: Lys: 214 A’.

CLIF/A4/1 · Item · c. 1870
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Trinity College, Cambridge.—Refers to the subject of marriage. Is annoyed at having to write testimonials. Presents a Latin credo in honour of the goddess Liberty.

—————

Transcript

Trin. Coll. Camb.

Dear Fred

Here, until the 12th. It is ordained for the procreation of children, and for a godly and wholesome discipline. {1}

Oh, I am mad!—mad!

x x x

17 people have written to ask me for prescriptions, I mean testimonials. They know that writing matrimonials drives me mad, that every testimony takes me a week to do, that it sears my conscience and sores my brain, that—why are people such fiends? They only does it to annoy, because they knows it teases. {2}

Therefore pity & forgive me, and persuade others to do the like.

I have killed 9 establishments and 4 baptists with Moss’s story about the cockatoo who letusprayed.

Make somebody put music to this

Credo in deam solam libertatem Matrem vitæ
Matrem viventium omnium Inscriptæ legis
fontem Humani generis totam gloriam {3}

or do you put it into latin with additions or subtractions.

Thine
(I will write a testimonial for the rest this evening)
W.K.C.

—————

{1} The first phrase comes from the marriage service in the Prayer Book; the second appears to be Clifford’s own invention, though the phrase ‘godly and wholesome Doctrine’ occurs in the thirty-fifth of the Thirty-Nine Articles (‘On the Homilies’).

{2} An adaptation of verses in Alice in Wonderland (1865):

Speak roughly to your little boy,
And beat him when he sneezes:
He only does it to annoy,
Because he knows it teases.

{3} ‘I believe in the only goddess Liberty, mother of life, mother of all living things, source of the written law, the whole glory of the human race.’

CLIF/E5/1 · Item · c. Nov. 1870
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(On the sheet used as a wrapper is a list of ‘Arrangements suggested by the members of the Bachelor’s Table [in the Hall at Trinity College] for regulating the introduction of Guests’, also in Clifford’s hand.)

—————

Transcript

1. The club shall be called the republican club.

2. Republicanism shall be taken to mean hostility to the hereditary principle as exemplified in monarchical and aristocratic institutions and to all social and political privileges depending upon difference of sex.

3. The profession of republican opinions shall be the only qualification for membership.

4. The club shall meet at dinner at 7 on three Wednesdays in the October and Lent terms, and on one in the May term.

Resolved The first dinner shall be held on Wednesday 23 Nov 1870.

5. At the beginning of every Oct Term a secretary shall be elected by ballot.

6. The sec. shall give at least 4 days notice of the place of the next dinner.

7. Each member shall be required to inform the secretary 2 days before the dinner whether he intends to be present. If he neglect to give notice of his intentions he shall be fined 5/-.

8. The secretary shall have the power of giving notice of subjects for discussion after the dinner. The discussion shall be carried on in a conversational manner, and must refer to some social or political subject.

9. Smoking shall be allowed after 10.

10. The secretary shall have the power at the request of three members, to invite a stranger sympathising with the objects of the club to the dinner.

11. No undergraduate shall be admitted to the club either as a member or as a stranger.

12. The club shall consist of [blank] original members. Candidates hereafter proposed at one meeting of the club shall be ballotted for at the next, and to be elected must be voted for by three-fourths of those present. The secretary shall give notice of the names of candidates for election.

13. Each member shall pay an annual subsc. of 5/–.

14. Any proposed alteration of the rules shall be given notice of at the previous meeting, to be carried must be voted for by a majority of the club.

Original Members {1}

Prof. Fawcett
H. Jackson
C H Pearson
G R Crotch
P T Main
W K Clifford—secretary
John Hatcher Moulton

[Written on the back of the wrapper:]

Arrangements suggested by the members of the Bachelors’ Table for regulating the introduction of Guests.

1. Every bachelor desirous of introducing a guest shall give notice to the Senior bachelor not later than at hall the day before.

2. The senior bachelor shall admit, according to priority of application, so many guests as, upon the testimony of the hall butler, there shall be room for.

3. The cook’s and combination butlers† account for the dinner of each guest shall be charged to the bachelor introducing him.

[Manicule.] It is proposed that the charge from the table for each guest be 2/6 on ordinary days and 3/ on feast days; notice of these being given by the senior bachelor as at present.

4. No members of Trinity College shall be introduced as Guests.

—————

The wrapper is docketed ‘WKC | Dft rules | Cambridge | Republican Club | (1870) | &c’.

{1} The names of Jackson and Pearson are each followed by a black mark. Moulton’s name was added in a different hand.

† Sic.

CLIF/A7/1 · Item · 12 Apr. 1876
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge.—Sends a contribution to the Clifford fund. Discusses Tait's criticisms of Mayer.

(With an envelope.)

—————

Transcript

Cavendish Laboratory
Cambridge
12 April 1876

Dear Pollock

I enclose £5 for the Clifford Fund. I hope that a slight displacement of his position on the earth’s surface may bring him into a milder air and one less stimulating than that at Gower Street, {1} so that as his oscillations between elliptic and hyperbolic space gradually subside he may find himself settling back again into that parabolic space wherein so many great and good men have been content to dwell, and may long enjoy the 3 treasures of the said great & good men as enumerated by S.T.C. {2}

The gospel according to Peter G. T. {3} although somewhat entêté {4} in the places where old controversies are fought over again is much sounder than it sounds when read aloud. The habit of lecturing generates a peculiar jargon which, when taken down by a reporter, looks strange. Tail† has always been proving that Mayer used inconclusive reasoning when he made an estimate of the dynamical equivalent of heat, {1} whereas Joule was on firm ground all along.

Hence Mayer should not have many marks for this piece of his work. But Mayer sent up ingenious answers to a great many questions propounded by nature, many wrong some right, but all clever. The strict examiner gives him but small credit for these but the historian of science must take account of the amount of good work by others which followed on the publication of Mayers† papers.

Now one man thinks most of the credit to be assigned to each individual as his property while another thinks most of the advance of science which is often associated by the noise even of fools, which directs wiser men to good diggings.

Yours truly
J Clerk Maxwell

[Direction on envelope:] F Pollock Esqre | 12 Bryanston Street | London W.

—————

The envelope was postmarked at Cambridge on 12 April 1876, and has been marked in pencil ‘Clerk Maxwell’.

{1} Comma supplied, in place of a full stop.

{2} Coleridge’s poem ‘Reproof’ contains the following lines:

Hath he not always treasures, always friends,
The great good man?—three treasures, love, and light,
And calm thoughts, regular as infant’s breath

{3} Peter Guthrie Tait.

{4} Obstinate (Fr.).

{5} This is probably the intended reading, but what is written resembles ‘Tail’.

† Sic.

CLIF/A4/10 · Item · 15 July 1876
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Malaga.—Lucy has been seasick. Discusses the religious situation in France, and deplores the effect of the Church on the character of the Spanish people. They have no definite news about the war.

—————

Transcript

Malaga.—Saturday 15th July—1876

My dearest Fred—You can’t think how glad we were to get our letters the other night. I thought my poor child would have gone crazy when we were kept rolling about in mid mediterranean and missed the boat from Almeria here. She got so weak from want of food and sickness that she fancied all sorts of things, and dreamt she had to leave the baby at 3 minutes to 9 on the 7th of July. The only thing she would touch at last was a couple of boiled eggs, because it seemed improbable that the filthy Spaniards could have got at the insides. The Pall Mall budget {1} was a great boon, and now an Englishman who feeds at the hotel has got me into the Círculo Malagueño for 8 days; it is a decent club and has a good many papers. I was amused at Greenwood’s remarks about Clémenceau and the religious irreconcileables—they are the pink of propriety and circumspection. He is no doubt right so far as he goes in calling it an “exaggeration” to attribute all our misfortunes to the Catholic Church; one might as well say the whole of our mortality comes from small-pox. But he is wrong in thinking that French liberals in the country are still to be “frightened” by statements of that sort; they are made daily, with more force and circumstance, by at least one paper in every town which is large enough to have a paper at all, and the Church is associated even in the minds of women with intrigues and conspiracies not merely against abstractions like liberty and the rights of man but against very present and concrete freedoms and conveniences of life. The “ordre moral” made itself thoroughly hated in its 3 years. There is some law which I don’t understand requiring authorization by the mayor of dancing at private parties exceeding a certain number. This authorization was given in the villages to friends of the clergy but refused to Republicans—and similar inconceivably petty tyrannies were practised everywhere. Hence the importance of the new municipal law. I believe that of 12 million adult men in France, 8 at least would have felt personal pleasure in kicking M. Buffet. At Avignon, a centre of reaction, I was buying a paper and asked if it was republican. “Ça sent beaucoup le clergé” said the old woman with a wry face and a shrug. “On n’observe plus que les fêtes du peuple” said the waiter at Marseilles when I asked if the band would play on ascension-day. The same thing holds throughout Algeria, except at Oran which is more than half Spanish. As for this country, I think it requires to be colonized by the white man. The savages would gradually die out in his presence. One sees here how God makes man through the instrumentality of his Holy Church, when He gets him all to Himself for some centuries. And a sickening sight it is. The mark of a degraded race is clear upon their faces; only the children have a look of honesty and intelligence, a fact which is also observed in the case of the negro, and is a case of Von Bär’s law that the development of the individual is an epitome of that of the race. It is instructive also to contrast the politeness fossilized in their language with the brutal coarseness of their present manners—of which I may sometime tell you what I will not soil paper with. I think it possible that one Spaniard may have told me the truth: he had lost so many teeth that he left out all his consonants, and I could not understand a word he said. When we went on board the Rosario at 11 p.m. the boatmen stood in the way to keep us from the ladder, and threatened us for the sake of another peseta over the regular charge. The steward tried to cheat me over the passage-money, but I appealed to the authorities who came on board at Malaga and got the money back. (There are many strangers here). Then he made another grab in the matter of our breakfasts, in the face of a tariff hung up in the cabin. It is tiring to have to think that every man you meet is ready to be your enemy out of pure cussedness. I don’t understand why one is expected to be polite and reticent about the distinction between the mixture of Hebrew piety and Roman universalism attributed to Jesus and Paul, and the ecclesiastical system which is only powerful over men’s lives in Spain, the middle and south of Italy, and Greece—countries where the population consists chiefly of habitual thieves and liars who are willing opportunely to become assassins for a small sum. I suppose it frightens people to be told that historical Xtianity as a social system invariably makes men wicked where it has full swing. Then I think the sooner they are well frightened the better. {2} We have no definite news here about the war. How would it do to add Hungary and German Austria to Germany, and make Austria into a Slav state with capital at Constantinople? The Hungarian freethinkers would balance the Austrian ultramontanes, and Russia would be well out of it. There is an Arab proverb that “where the Turk has trod the grass never grows”—but a good deal of ploughing and irrigation might efface his footsteps. Best love to Georgie & the little kid. I am now convinced that we are really the same person. À la libertad.

Thy
Willi

—————

{1} The Pall Mall Budget was a weekly paper, founded on 3 October 1868, containing a selection of articles from the Pall Mall Gazette. Cf. CLIF A4/14.

{2} ‘As for this country . . . the better.’ This passage has been marked off in pencil, square brackets being placed around the two sentences ‘One sees here how God … sight it is.’

CLIF/A1/10 · Item · c. 1870?
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

58 Montagu Square, London, W.—His health did not suffer by the journey. He got to the ‘diagram man’ just in time to prevent him spoiling them. The experiment will not ‘come off’, but he will repeat the lecture elsewhere in order to do it. ‘Miladi’ (Lady Pollock) has written to her.

(Dated Thursday. The reference to ‘Miladi’ (Lady Pollock) suggests that the letter was written after 23 August 1870, when her husband succeeded to the baronetcy. A reference to Cambridge suggests a date before September 1871, when Clifford moved to London.)

—————

Transcript

59 Montagu Square, London, W. {1}

Dearest Mama

I am very much better and did not take any cold on the journey. Mitchell was a great brick and took all possible care of me, and I kept wrapped up all the way. Walter met me on the station and carried me off in a cab. I have been lying down a good deal, and only appeared for a short time last night. This morning I breakfasted in bed, but got to the diagram man only just in time; for he is very stupid and would have spoilt all the diagrams {2} in another day. The experiment I am afraid won’t come off; but I can’t be beaten in that way, and shall repeat the lecture somewhere else on purpose to do it—perhaps make a Sunday lecture of it at Cambridge. This afternoon I have been consulting authorities at the Royal institution, and am rather tired; but now I shall take a long rest. Miladi says she wrote to you this morning but is not sure that Walter has not made a mistake about posting it. I have got some more poppy-heads. How are Edie’s throat and Kitty’s tooth and your indigestion? Now I must stop and have some tea, and send the letter to post; so good-bye.

Your most loving son.
Willie.

Thursday afternoon.

—————

Black-edged paper.

{1} The home of (William) Frederick Pollock.

{2} Probably diagrams for a lecture. As the next sentence indicates, the lecture had originally been intended to include an experiment.

CLIF/A3/10 · Item · 1876?
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Place of writing not indicated.)—Has been working with Lockyer on molecules and talking metaphysics with Huxley. Refers to his (own) talk on ‘the right and wrong of admitting the results of the scientific method in certain ground which it has already occupied’.

—————

Transcript

Dear Fred—Very sorry I can’t come to be wound up on Wednesday but we are going to the play. I am so tired, having spent the day at work with Lockyer at a paper on molecules, and the evening in talking metaphysics with Huxley. I think we have got out satisfactorily that the force between 2 molecules cannot be entirely in the line joining their centres as everybody has hitherto supposed, and this suits admirably my guess that they are small magnets.

As to my sermon, {1} I suppose it may be called so because the tag {2} dealt with the right and wrong of admitting the results of the scientific method in certain ground which it has already occupied. Now this point, that it is right to use the scientific method even on this ground, and that it is wrong to resist the evidence because the results are unpleasing, is to me a point of infinitely more importance to get people to feel, than without that to make them gently believe any amount of unorthodox doctrine. A question of right and wrong knows neither time, place, nor expediency. I think we have made a mistake in our laissez faire. It is not an intellectual revolution that has to be accomplished. The opinion of cultivated people goes of itself at an enormous rate; but the control of the feelings of the masses is falling more and more into the hands of the medicine-man, and he is awake to his true vocation and preaches social sedition. I am afraid for my civilization if we do not make an effort to discredit him, and to get people to recognize what they have hitherto acted on, that the right is an affair of plain open dealing and not of ghosts and conjuring tricks. They can be talked out of that here and now as they have been before in other places; and the clergy of all denominations are doing their worst with no small success.

Thine ever
Willi.

—————

{1} Possibly 'Right and Wrong’ or ‘The Ethics of Belief’.

CLIF/A7/10 · Item · 28 Mar. 1881
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Trinity Lodge, Cambridge.—Explains why he has not yet subscribed for the relief of Clifford's widow, and asks Pollock to convey the enclosed sum to her anonymously.

(With an envelope.)

—————

Transcript

Trinity Lodge, Cambridge
28 Mar 1881

Dear Frederick Pollock

When your father asked me some time ago to subscribe to a Memorial or rather—for it was in his life time—a public Testimonial to Prof. Clifford, I declined to do so, for reasons which I still think valid. I think it was after his death that I said I would subscribe for the relief of his widow, for whom I feel a sincere compassion. If I have failed to do so, it was not because I had changed my mind in the matter, but simply because the Memorial was still designed {1} in honour of her husband & contained words to which I could not affix my name. I wish now to redeem whatever pledge I may have given, & beg that if you think the poor lady will accept the sum enclosed you will kindly convey it to her—without mentioning my name.

You will judge how far this is possible without offending her delicacy. It seemed to me possible that she might not disdain to receive a little additional help from one who had as much admiration for her late husband’s talents as he had disapproval of his philosophical opinions.

Believe me
Yours very truly
W. H Thompson

[Direction on envelope:] F. Pollock Esq | 48 Gt Cumberland Place | London | W

—————

The envelope was postmarked at Cambridge and London, W., on 28 March 1881, and has been marked ‘Master of Trinity | for L.C.’

{1} Reading uncertain.

CLIF/A3/11 · Item · 1867 x 1871
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Devon and Exeter Institution.—Commends Hullett's intellectual and teaching abilities and his character.

(The initial greeting is ‘Gentlemen’. Hullett passed the Mathematics Tripos in 1867. This letter was probably written not long afterwards.)

—————

Transcript

Devon and Exeter Institution

To the [blank]

Gentlemen

I have had the pleasure of knowing Mr Hullett during the whole time that he was at the University, and have formed a very high opinion both of his attainments and of his teaching powers. The former are most inadequately represented by his place in the Tripos {1}. That he was not tenth or twelfth was in my opinion and in that of every one able to judge, the result merely of a combination of those accidents which are inseparable from such an Examination.

Mr Hullett’s abilities as a teacher are greater than those commonly met with in persons of so high standing. I have often admired his great patience and clearness, and his determination to get things understood; and I am indebted to him for several valuable hints on the methods of teaching elementary mathematics. I have the cause of education very much at heart, and for this reason should hear with extreme pleasure of Mr Hullett’s appointment to a place where his talents in this direction might find room to act. I feel sure that the result of such an appointment would be the great benefit of all those who would receive the advantage of his teaching.

Mr Hullett possesses great interest and considerable information in scientific subjects, and a most cultivated literary taste. Finally, his personal character is such as cannot fail to win the affections and raise the tone of his pupils.

I have the honour to be, gentlemen,
Your obedt servant
W. K.Clifford.

—————

{1} Hullett passed the Mathematics Tripos in 1867 as 31st Wrangler.