Mostrar 3 resultados

Descrição arquivística
Daily Mail (newspaper) Com objeto digital
Previsualizar a impressão
Visualização em ficha Visualização em tabela
Two copy letters from J. G. Frazer to John Roscoe
Two copy letters from J. G. Frazer to John Roscoe
Add. MS b/37/143-144 · Item · c 1947-c 1955
Parte de Additional Manuscripts b

Hotel Lutetia, Paris. Dated 23-24 November 1920 - On the 23rd, he writes he has heard that a long account of the expedition was published in 'The Daily Mail' and is sorry to hear that such a 'low and vulgar paper' should have the first report of a scientific expedition, 'even Sir Peter Mackie is probably not a good judge as to the proper mode of publishing the results'. On the 24th he says he has written [Sir Peter Mackie] that a full report should be deferred until after the dinner; Lilly has written their friend [Wickham Steed] of 'The Times' about it.
Copy letter from John Roscoe to J. G. Frazer
Copy letter from John Roscoe to J. G. Frazer
Add. MS b/37/145 · Item · c 1947-c 1955
Parte de Additional Manuscripts b

Ovington Rectory, Thetford. Dated 25 November 1920 - Writes his side of the story concerning the article in the 'Daily Mail', condoned by Sir Peter Mackie so that he felt he had no choice; does not believe Mackie is giving him a dinner, and no one at the Royal Society has mentioned a speech; finds the muddle most distasteful and is sorry Frazer is away.
Copy letter from J. G. Frazer to John Roscoe
Copy letter from J. G. Frazer to John Roscoe
Add. MS b/37/146 · Item · c 1947-c 1955
Parte de Additional Manuscripts b

Hotel Lutetia, Paris. Dated 27 November 1920 - Writes in response to Roscoe's defense of the interview with the 'Daily Mail', and states that he could not have done anything else, shares his distate for interviews; does not know the protocol for the Royal Society dinners and thinks he should trust [Arthur] Keith to guide him through it.