54 Cours Napoléon, Ajaccio (Corse) - He writes that he has been at the Archives where he was working on a parochial register 1771-1773 which has tired his eyes; is not suprised by what she says of Condorcet, he is less interested in people than spirits; he will reread it carefully as it is necessary to find the right audience; is pleased to hear that the incident between [R. R.] Marett and [Elliott] Smith has had a happy ending; he wonders why she stays at Trinity so little; he will go to the Folklore conference with them, and to the Madame Renan fête; he does not know the 'Voyages' of Renan, wonders how that is.
54 Cours Napoléon, Ajaccio (Corse) [and letter of 16 Jan.:] Hotel Bedford, 17 Rue de L'Arcade, Madeleine, Paris - Letters written 2, 7, and 16 Jan. He writes that he is sorry to hear she is not happy, and that the hotel is too loud; is concerned about Frazer's eyes and mode of working and need to rest his eyes; details his plans to travel to France; mentions having normal vision but that after three hours of writing he tires; Has put the print of the Trinity gate up in a corner full of her souvenirs; is sorry to hear they have left the Goldsmith [building]; is happy to hear of a conference in Sir James' honour.
13 Old Square, Linc : Inn - Thanks him for the little Renan book ['Quatre témoignages sur Anatole France], and discusses Greek indifference to picturesqueness; is awaiting further disclosures about the Zinoviev dispatch, thinks [Ramsay MacDonald] is dishonest if it is genuine, and also an incompetent Foreign Secretary if it is not.
The Lodge, Westminster College, Cambridge - Is sending him books and makes recommendations for books to read on the history of Israel (Renan is unreliable, Wellhausen is good but very slight), and Old Testament religion (Smend's 'Religionsgeschichte' is heavy but solid and valuable').
Uncorrected proof with running head 'The Gorgon's Head and Other Literary Pieces'; accompanied by an envelope with note in Frazer's hand, '(Proof by R. and R. Clark intended for "Gorgon's Head" volume of Essays), full of mistakes, useless for copy.' Postmark date on envelope (possibly used to send an earlier proof?) is 11 July 1927, blind stamp dated on proof (acquired during posting?) is 14 July 1927.
Announces that he has been working on an edition of the '1st Decade' [of Livy] for two years and hopes to have it published soon. Asks Sidgwick if he does not try getting up candidates of his own. Reports that he has heard from Hepworth Dixon 'that the author is [Walword] [or some such name] Secretary to the Civil Service Commission.' Does not think that Sidgwick makes out a case for Grote, and his criticisms of Seeley's work. Asks if there is no criticism 'but of the [Strauss] and [Renan] kind'. Comments that he found them dealing too much in conjecture; that they should 'let alone' the discrepancies of the Gospel, 'and stick to that in which they agree.' Announces that he is writing a preface, which he intends to send to Sidgwick for criticisms. Of the poems, observes that they were 'good in metre and showy in style, but crude in [theory] and nothing in imagination - as E[cce] H[omo] is in spite of [Seeley's] admirers.'
Seeley, Sir John Robert (1834-1895), knight, historianIn Nora Sidgwick's hand. Declares his aim: to give an account of his life - mainly his inner intellectual life - 'as shall render the central and fundamental aims that partially at least determined its course when apparently most fitful and erratic, as clear and intelligible as [he] can.' Refers to biographical information in 'the Life of Edward Benson' [by A. C. Benson], in which he noted 'the great change that took place about the middle of [his] undergraduate time', which was triggered by his becoming a member of the discussion society known as the Apostles. Refers to a description of the latter in the late Dean Merivale's autobiography. Describes the spirit of the society as that of 'the pursuit of truth with absolute devotion and unreserved by a group of intimate friends, who were perfectly frank with each other and indulgent in any amount of humourous [sic] sarcasm and playful banter....' Emphasises the importance of sincerity, but not necessarily of gravity in its discussions. Had at first been reluctant to join the society, as he believed that it would interfere with his work for his two triposes, but came to feel that no part of his life at Cambridge was so real to him as the Saturday evenings he spent at the meetings at which Apostolic debates were held.
It was many years before he was to embrace the study of philosophy as his life's work: the reasons for this were partly financial. He had to accept the Classical lectureship that was offered to him on October 1859, and therefore had to devote a considerable amount of time to classical study. He also allowed himself 'to be seduced into private tuition as a means of increasing [his] income.' Adds that Cambridge vacations being long, he had a good deal of spare time, and he began a systematic study of philosophy, reading J.S. Mill's works. Discusses the influence that the latter had on him, but adds that he was 'by no means [then] disposed to acquiesce in negative or agnostic answers', and hat he had not in any way broken with the orthodox Christianity in which he had been brought up, though he had been sceptical of it.
Refers also to his study of theology and political economy. In 1862 he was very impressed by Renan's Essai [Études] d'histoire religieuse, and derived from that work that it was 'impossible really to understand at first hand Christianity as a historical religion without penetrating more deeply the mind of the Hebrews and of the Semitic stock from which they sprang.' This led him to devote much time to studying Arabic and Hebrew. Refers to an article he wrote on [J. R. Seeley's] Ecce Homo in the Westminster Review of July 1863, in which he reveals the provisional conclusions that he had formed with regard to Christianity. Says he found some relief from the great internal debate on the subjects of Christianity, Scepticism and Agnosticism in the renewal of his linguistic studies. His study of Arabic and Hebrew literature and history led him to think that he might secure one of the two professorships in Arabic at Cambridge. Believed that the inclusion of theology in the remit of the single chair of Moral Philosophy made it unlikely that he would attain this, since he was neither a clergyman nor orthodox.
Began to realise that the study of Arabic and Hebrew were drawing him away from 'the central problems which constituted [his] deepest interest', and the study of philosophy and theology began again to occupy more of his time. He accepted the examinership in the Moral Sciences Tripos, and was later offered a lectureship in Moral Science in exchange for his classical lectureship, and accepted. Determined to throw himself into the work of making a philosophical school in Cambridge. Had meanwhile been led back to the study of philosophy 'by a quite different line [of thought]', which led him to question whether he should keep his fellowship or not. Refers to his work The Methods of Ethics, and thoughts systematised therein. Note here by Nora Sidgwick refers to remarks made by Henry in relation to the 'miraculous birth' [of Jesus], the Resurrection and Ascension.
Also refers to psychical research, and his desire to attain direct proof of continual individual existence, 'which he regarded as necessary from an ethical point of view.' In relation to the education of women, states that he took up this cause 'as a piece of practically useful work for mankind', and that he turned his thoughts towards it after he had given up his fellowship.
Nora adds that the above information was written down from recollection 'not immediately after he said it.' Envelope accompanies 105/46-50. Addressed to Nora Sidgwick at Newnham College. Label "some MS notes, including 'Autobiographical Fragment', and 'Henry's instructions about his unfinished work etc.'"
Sidgwick, Henry (1838-1900), philosopherTypescript of a lecture originally given to the Ernest Renan Society, which was corrected by Frazer and by Paul Alphandéry for inclusion in 'La Grande Revue' (March 1921), though Frazer notes Alphandéry's corrections were not received in time for inclusion there.
Collège de France - Thanks him for his moving speech [at the ceremony in honour of Ernest Renan]; hopes he will give them the manuscript to publish and for their archives.
Collège de France - Invites him to give a short speech at their ceremony in honour of [Ernest] Renan on 28 Feb.
Institut Privé de Pédologie et d'Anthropologie Appliquées, Toulouse, 55 Rue Barrau - Had the pleasure of meeting Frazer at a reception at the University of Nancy, where they spoke about the symbolism of carpet designs, a topic Renan was interested in; introduces a student from the Ecole Normale Superieure, M. [René?] Maheu, who wishes to study Berkeley's Neoplatonism and the [Platonists?] at Cambridge.
Oxford, 18 Bradmore Road - Has been ill with grippe and bronchitis, and will not be able to accept the invitation to come to Bath for the Christmas weekend; they read the article by Vincent de Peretti about Renan and Frazer with pleasure; admires the portrait of Sir James in the 'Manchester Journal'.
55 rue de Babylone, Paris 7e - Thanks him for sending him 'Sur Ernest Renan', admires it, agrees with him about the Bourdelle bust as well; asks if he may send his 'Chine' as a gift in return; was sorry not to see more of them, has been unwell.
Paris - Read the poem Sir James wrote [about Lady Frazer] with great emotion, and notes it reminds her of her parents; sends them good wishes for the new year; Dr d'Allonnes is on his mission to Argentina where he will be able to try out new methods; spoke to Dr Alphandéry, who says the Frazers will be there in April, which will be a great pleasure.
Paris, 16 rue Chaptal - Is very glad to hear what he has to say of her father [Ernest Renan], but the news of Lady Frazer's health is alarming; thanks him for thinking of her young musicians, she will send the works of her son-in-law [Robert Siohan] to Frazer's friend in Dijon; will send [Robert's] concert programmes; her other son-in-law Dr d'Allonnes is going to Argentina on a scientific expedition.
Paris, 16 rue Chaptal - Spoke with M. Ceccaldi at the S.R. [Société Renan] about her; Lucien has passed the first part of his baccalauréat with honours; has received the first volume of her father's correspondence, and hopes they will mention it in an English journal; thinks in reading it Sir James will more fully understand the thoughts of another age.
La Béchellerie, Indre et Loire - Is visiting her grandson; her daughter was operated on in February and is recovering; when she lacks courage she thinks of the Frazers, whom she admires profoundly; asks if they have read the hostile publications about her father[?], and thinks the English show more pride in their writers; she is angry at the news about M. Houtin and is going to write him expressing her sympathy.
Paris [postcard with an image of the Fontaine Miraculeuse in Ste-Dives à Loguivy] - Thanks her, it is always nice to see her father's name next to that of her illustrious and excellent husband.
Paris, 16 rue Chaptal [postcard with a circular photograph of a gathering in front of the Ernest Renan statue in Tréguier] - Is sorry to miss her to say goodbye but she must be with her daughter, who is ill.
16 rue Chaptal [on mourning stationery] - Thanks him for ['Sur Ernest Renan']; has invited Mr and Mrs Aveline and Mr Kruyt to a party on Saturday, but Kruyt has to return to Holland that morning.
Paris, 16 rue Chaptal - Congratulates the Frazers, he reminds her of her father [Ernest Renan], who knew that one could and should escape the ugliness in humanity; thanks them for the book; she has spent a sad winter worried about the health of her daughter Mme D'Allonnes, but the young artists are well and provide much consolation. Accompanied by the envelope.
Manuscript draft, corrected, in Frazer's hand., and typescript, corrected.
The Holborn Review, The Poplars, Albert Road, Whalley Range, Manchester - Is sorry Sir James was unwell and could not come to get the Honorary Degree; is interested to read what she says about Houtin's work on 'Père Hyacinthe' and wanting a review, if she wants to write an article he'd be pleased to publish it, and discusses length, date of publication, and honorarium; her letter mentioned an enclosure but it was not included, though he gathers it is something written by Sir James on Renan and is interested to hear about it.
The Lodge, Westminster College, Cambridge. Dated February 14th 1916 - Is sending him books and makes recommendations for books to read on the history of Israel (Ernest Renan is unreliable, Julius Wellhausen is good but very slight), and Old Testament religion (Rudolf Smend's 'Religionsgeschichte' is heavy but solid and valuable').
States that the 'Shakespeare of [their] age' [Mrs Lewes/George Eliot] has sent the 'enclosed' [not included], and asks Myers to return it. Looks forward to seeing Myers 'on Saturday.' Regrets that Browning 'does not give satisfaction', and confesses to being partly responsible, as he 'approved in a general way Browning's plea'. Claims to be 'rather vague as to [his] notions of teaching history by letter.' Declares Myers' pupils' letter to be 'very interesting, but states that it would 'somewhat perplex' him to answer it straightforwardly. Remarks that Taine 'certainly does overdo his philopaganism', and that he [Sidgwick] 'should administer Renan (suppressing his name)'. With regard to Lady Amberley states that he once saw her and thought she showed off and expected him to do the same too much. Claims that he has to be 'in unusually high spirits to feel pleasantly stirred by this variety of the neo-feminine type.
Westroad Corner, Cambridge - Returns Mme Renan's letters [Noémi Cornélie Henriette Psichari?], which he read with much interest; provides a copy of the inscription on Renan's statue at Tréguier.
Thanks him for the gift and note, offers to send the book that Frazer is looking for [by her father Ernest Renan] if he does not find it in London.