Showing 4 results

Archival description
Add. MS a/355/4/22 · Item · 25 Feb. 1928
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, London, S.W.7.—Has been reading An Introduction to Bibliography. Communicates some notes on the position of watermarks, etc.

(Not posted till the 27th. See Add. MS 355/4/23.)

—————

Transcript

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, London S.W.7
Feb. 25 1928

Dear Sir
I am reading with much interest your book on Bibliography and as a Student of Watermarks have noted especially what you say about the help given by such marks towards determining the format of books. As you speak of certain obscurities respecting abnormal positions of the marks, you might possibly be interested to have a few notes which I have made on the subject, though I have not yet brought them together at all systematically.

I have some examples at least of an exactly central position in the sheet, but the only one that occurs to me at the moment is in Rivinus: ‘Introductio … in Rem Herbarium’ (Leipzig 1690-91) a largish folio with the chain-lines normal. It is interesting as an instance (not a solitary one) of paper made specially for a book, the mark being D.A.Q.R., which letters, standing for D. Augustus Quirinus Rivinus, appear also printed on the title-p. to Vol. 2. I have a good many examples of a position near the edge of the sheet, {1} from papers probably made in Central or Southern France, e.g. from the Ptolemy’s of 1535 and 1541 edited by Servetus, a small Strabo printed at Lyon in 1559, and in Billingsley’s Euclid of 1570. A much less common arrangement is that in which mark and counter-mark are in the upper and lower halves of the same ½ sheet (I have no dated ex. of this) and there is a mark of the Dutch maker Adriaan Rogge (late 18th cent.) in which two elephants face each other in the centres of the half-sheets and the maker’s monogram is in the centre. I have once found the date of a French 18th cent. paper placed centrally at the top of the sheet, mark and counter-mark being in the usual positions. Another abnormal case is that of a paper made in France by G. Dalençon (c. 1750) which has the mark repeated four times in the four quarters of the same half-sheet.* [Footnote: ‘*Instances of two fairly elaborate marks, one in each half of the sheet, are sometimes found—I mean entirely different marks.’]

You tentatively suggest 1670 as about the date when countermarks began to appear. I have found them however fairly often from quite early in that century, mostly if not always in con-junction with the bunch of grapes on French papers. They occur thus, e.g., in Camden’s Britannia of 1607, Speed’s Theatrum of 1616 (and later), and in Milton’s Commonplace book at the Brit. Museum. The countermark may be the maker’s name in full or merely initials. (A countermark in the corner is of course common in Venetian paper at a much earlier date.)

As to the direction of the chain lines, I have found an apparent case of horizontal direction (on the sheet) in Cluver’s† {2} ‘Introd. ad Universalem Geographiam’, Amsterdam, 1697, to all appearance a 4to volume (leaf, cut, 9¼ x 7") and with the watermark (the monogram ICH {3}) in the normal position for a quarto. Even were the book a large 8vo cut down at the top & bottom, the mark would be in an abnormal position, and besides there are chain-lines closer than in the sheet as a whole near both outer edges of the sheets as folded, showing that it is not a case of half-sheets gathered in fours.

I hope I have not wearied you with these remarks; which may not contain anything that you do not know well already. I thought that the above specific instances might be of some interest.

Yours very truly
Edward Heawood

I have several thousands of water-mark tracings, and should be only too glad if they could be found of use in connection with any bibliographical puzzle.

—————

{1} A page ends here. Followed by ‘P.T.O.’

{2} McKerrow has written in the margin, ‘P. Cluvier’.

{3} The three letters are written one above the other.

Add. MS a/355/4/23 · Item · 27 Feb. 1928
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, S.W.7.—Adds a note he omitted to include in his letter (Add. MS. 355/4/22).

—————

Transcript

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, S.W.7
Feb. 27, 1928

Dear Sir

In my letter posted this morning {1} I omitted to say that in the Lyon Strabo of 1557 the watermark appears (divided) exactly in the centre of the front edges. The book is in gatherings of 8, and to an inexperienced cataloguer would present a puzzle,—whether it should be called 12mo or 16mo. Although it is the shape of a 12mo I conclude it is 16mo, printed and folded in half-sheets, this being borne out by the fact that in the first 28 sheets 12 have the watermarks (the same throughout) and 11 have none, though they do not alternate quite regularly. (In the rest of the book the blanks seem more numerous, but some of the marks may have been cut away entirely.) The chain-lines are horizontal on the leaves.

Yrs. v. truly
E. Heawood

[Direction:] R. B. McKerrow Esq. | Enderley | Great Missenden | Bucks

—————

Postmarked at S. Kensington, S.W.7, at 3.15 p.m. on 27 February 1928.

{1} Add. MS. a. 355/4/22, dated the 25th.

{2} Closing bracket supplied.

Add. MS a/355/4/24 · Item · 2 Mar. 1928
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, S.W.7.—Corrects his previous assertion about the format of an edition of Arrian.

—————

Transcript

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, S.W.7
Mar. 2, 1928

I was wrong in saying that even if the paper used for the Arrian was a larger size cut down the chain-lines would still be horizontal in the sheet. Of course if the paper were so much larger that half-sheets cut down still further to fit the folio shape would still be large enough, the existing facts could be explained on the assumption of chain-lines normally placed. But the position of the water-mark would then be abnormal unless the original sheets were at least 30 ins. long, the centre of the mark being 7½" from one end as trimmed. In another case (certain sheets in Churchill’s voyages 3rd. edn. 1744) they would have had to lose about ⅓ of the original length if the chain-lines were normal. Perhaps this might be explained by supposing the right size had fallen short, or a bale had been damaged before use. But such cases would introduce a disturbing element of uncertainty if at all frequent.

Yrs. v. truly
E. Heawood

[Direction:] R. B. McKerrow Esq. | Enderley | Little Kingshill | Great Missenden | Bucks

—————

Postmarked at S. Kensington, S.W.7, at 5.30 p.m. on 2 March 1928.

Add. MS a/355/4/26 · Item · 14 Mar. 1928
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, London, S.W.7.—His notes on the position of watermarks are to be printed in The Library. The format of Voyages de Texeira (1681) is unusual.

—————

Transcript

Royal Geographical Society, Kensington Gore, London, S.W.7
March 14 1928

Dear Mr. McKerrow

Following your suggestion, I jotted down the substance of my notes on the Position of Watermarks and sent the article to Dr Pollard, who says he will print it in the Library. {1} I fear it is difficult to estimate the proportion of abnormalities to the total at all precisely, but I am working through Briquet & my own collection of later marks to try & get some rough idea.

Shortly after writing before I remembered another undoubted case of a central position viz. a series of marks (letters only) in the 1695 ed. of Camden’s Britannia, on paper which I imagine to be Genoese. Briquet gives quite a number of examples of centrally placed marks from N. Italy in quite early days. In my notes I have quoted a case of a folio book printed on a paper of rather uncommon shape & size (though apparently made fairly often in Italy), so that the shape (& size) of the book resembles that of 4to (O. Magnus: ‘Hist. de Gentibus Septentr.’ Rome 1555).

I have today noticed a case of a 12mo book in gatherings of 8 and 4 alternately, which I take it is not very common (Voyages de Texeira, Paris 1681). This is also interesting from the statement in the Prelim. leaves “Les exemplaires ont esté fournis”. Does this mean that the whole edition (apart from the prelim. leaves) had to be submitted for the privelege†, or to whom would they otherwise be furnished? The precise date of registration in the ‘Livre … de Imprimeurs …’ is also given.

Believe me
Yours very truly
Edward Heawood

—————

{1} See ‘The Position on the Sheet of Early Watermarks’, The Library, 4th series, vol. 9, no. 1 (June 1928), pp. 38-47.

† Sic.