Park Lodge, Wimbledon, S.W.—Rejects Nichol Smith’s criticism of the prospectus, and discusses the composition of the panel.
—————
Transcript
Park Lodge, Wimbledon, S.W.
14 Jan. 1924
Dear McKerrow
We got home this afternoon & your letter arrived an hour later. I found one from Grierson accepting & wishing success.
I dont think Nichol Smith is in any way essential & as he was declining I thought his criticism unnecessary. {1} I told him I agreed generally that the most fruitful work of the last gener-ation had been English & not German but that that did not seem to me any objection to the sentence in the circular. I also said that while I had no desire to minister to German swelled head still less did I wish to pander to smug English selfcomplacency. So I expect he felt his knuckles rapped but being a nice fellow I hope he wont bear a grudge.
I am glad the appeal has been a success. I am not sure what representation we have from Cambridge—except on that score Chadwick is not the least essential. A. C. Bradley—except as an advertisement—would be no use at all me judice. {2}
Ever yours
W. W. Greg
I hope to be lunching on Thursday. {3}
—————
{1} See MCKW A3/11b.
{2} ‘In my judgement.’
{3} 17th.