Showing 4 results

Archival description
Add. MS a/666/3 · Item · 23 Mar. 1870
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

5 Cliff Point, Higher Broughton, Manchester.—Thomson’s paper was well received by the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society.

—————

Transcript

5 Cliff Point | Hr Broughton | Manchester 23/3/70

Dear Thomson

We had the best meeting of our Society {1} there has been this year, nearly every one of any mark in the Manchester scientific world being present. Your paper {2} was received with a great deal of interest and is now in the printers hands so as to give you time to see a proof

Yours ever truly
James P Joule

—————

{1} A meeting of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, held the previous day. Joule was president.

{2} Thomson’s paper, ‘Voltaic Potential Differences and Atomic Sizes’, printed in the Society’s Proceedings, vol. 9, pp. 136-41.

Add. MS a/204/147 · Item · 2 Oct. 1862
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Pitlochry, Perthshire - Has WW seen in the Philosophical Magazine for July, August and September a controversy involving John Tyndall and James Joule over 'a question of priority, much resembling Tyndall's advocacy of Rendu at my expense?' The dispute centres on the ''Dynamical theory of heat' or the 'convertibility of force' and the meteonic theory of the sun's heat'. Tyndall gives the credit of these theories to 'an unknown German physician named Mayer'. William Thomson and Joule 'are treated a good deal in the way I was'. Both have written replies, Joule in the Philosophical Magazine and Thomson in the Glasgow periodical called 'Good Words'. JDF gives a long quote from Thomson's piece.

Letter from William Thomson
Add. MS a/213/124 · Item · 31 Dec. 1853
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Manchester - WT [later Lord Kelvin] encloses a 'statement of objects of research on the thermal effects of fluids in motion, and an account of expenditure by Mr Joule [James Joule] and myself'. The investigations are described in a paper communicated to the Royal Society last June and now printed. He hopes to communicate another one in a few weeks.

CLIF/A7/1 · Item · 12 Apr. 1876
Part of Papers of W. K. Clifford

Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge.—Sends a contribution to the Clifford fund. Discusses Tait's criticisms of Mayer.

(With an envelope.)

—————

Transcript

Cavendish Laboratory
Cambridge
12 April 1876

Dear Pollock

I enclose £5 for the Clifford Fund. I hope that a slight displacement of his position on the earth’s surface may bring him into a milder air and one less stimulating than that at Gower Street, {1} so that as his oscillations between elliptic and hyperbolic space gradually subside he may find himself settling back again into that parabolic space wherein so many great and good men have been content to dwell, and may long enjoy the 3 treasures of the said great & good men as enumerated by S.T.C. {2}

The gospel according to Peter G. T. {3} although somewhat entêté {4} in the places where old controversies are fought over again is much sounder than it sounds when read aloud. The habit of lecturing generates a peculiar jargon which, when taken down by a reporter, looks strange. Tail† has always been proving that Mayer used inconclusive reasoning when he made an estimate of the dynamical equivalent of heat, {1} whereas Joule was on firm ground all along.

Hence Mayer should not have many marks for this piece of his work. But Mayer sent up ingenious answers to a great many questions propounded by nature, many wrong some right, but all clever. The strict examiner gives him but small credit for these but the historian of science must take account of the amount of good work by others which followed on the publication of Mayers† papers.

Now one man thinks most of the credit to be assigned to each individual as his property while another thinks most of the advance of science which is often associated by the noise even of fools, which directs wiser men to good diggings.

Yours truly
J Clerk Maxwell

[Direction on envelope:] F Pollock Esqre | 12 Bryanston Street | London W.

—————

The envelope was postmarked at Cambridge on 12 April 1876, and has been marked in pencil ‘Clerk Maxwell’.

{1} Comma supplied, in place of a full stop.

{2} Coleridge’s poem ‘Reproof’ contains the following lines:

Hath he not always treasures, always friends,
The great good man?—three treasures, love, and light,
And calm thoughts, regular as infant’s breath

{3} Peter Guthrie Tait.

{4} Obstinate (Fr.).

{5} This is probably the intended reading, but what is written resembles ‘Tail’.

† Sic.