The circumstances under which Churchill became Prime Minister were not as Amery represents them in his review of Churchill’s book (The Gathering Storm).
—————
Transcript
11th. October, 1948.
To the Editor of “The Spectator”
Sir,—
The Churchillian Epic
In the interests of Historical accuracy I must express my dissent from the impression conveyed by the conculding† paragraph of Mr. Amery’s review of Mr. Churchill’s book {1}.
No doubt it is true that it was the decision of the three men on May 10, 1940 that made Mr. Churchill Prime Minister. But this decision was based on the political situation in the House of Commons.
It was generally recognised that in the national emergency there must be a Coalition Government. The Labour Party had refused to serve under Mr. Chamberlain. The question of serving under Lord Halifax never arose, but it is inconceivable that they would have agreed, first, because he was in the upper House and secondly, because he had been an active supporter of Mr. Chamberlain’s “appeasement” of Hitler. They were prepared to serve under Mr. Churchill. No other possible choice presented itself.
These facts may not have been positively known at the time by all the three men. But there was the strongest presumptive evidence that they were true.
Yours etc.,
[blank]
The Editor,
The Spectator,
99, Gower Street,
London, W.C.1.
—————
{1} The Second World War, Vol. 1: The Gathering Storm.
† Sic.
