Affichage de 75979 résultats

Description archivistique
4267 résultats avec objets numériques Afficher les résultats avec des objets numériques
Typed letter from Frank [Tait]
SHAF/A/1/T/1 · Pièce · 24 June [1975?]
Fait partie de Papers of Sir Peter Shaffer

He misses Peter, and describes his experience of heat as a tactile experience and as close as he'll get to communion; wonders if most Catholic countries are hot and if the weather explains Scottish Presbyterianism; discusses the effects of budget restrictions, the need to define mental illness and ethical guidelines for behavior modification treatments; discusses 'No Man's Land', admires John Gielgud and Ralph Richardson; Elizabeth [Cavendish?] is back and rested, and he deems regular breaks necessary for her; reacts to Peter's story of a group therapy session.

Notebook of letters from Denis Zaphiro
SHAF/A/1/Z/1 · Pièce · 1944-1945
Fait partie de Papers of Sir Peter Shaffer

Letters tipped into a paper-bound notebook labelled ‘Letters Book I’ on front:
Undated, ‘My dear Peter. What a pleasant surprise!’ 4 sheets. A lengthy narrative describes how Peter's gift reminds him of climbing Moricelli in Italy and finding shells there in a pool, similar to those Peter has sent; writes at length about his own story about an anchorite.
[1 Aug. 1944?], ‘Well Peter; here in London and finding it most exciting too’ 2 sheets. Life in London during bombing [Doodlebug Summer], and the attitude to death and reaction to bombing raids, lunchtime bombing of Kensington High St. Disagrees that modern war is not romantic.
Undated, ‘Saturday 1944’ 4 sheets. He meant Peter to understand that he was parodying Peter's style in his last letter, and is disappointed that Peter did not see this; has seen Ernest Milton in Macbeth, and discusses Wolfit in 3 Shakespeare plays; finds it is easy to be Shylockian; is disappointed in his (Denis') story, thinks he is too young yet, will put it away until he is older.
Envelope dated 23 Mar. 1945
Undated, Friday: 11th: 1944 1 sheet. Sends a volume of Italian short stories.
Undated, ‘Thursday. I feel very vicious this morning’ 1 sheet, with two pen-and-ink drawing of himself looking irate on verso. Asks him to write.
Undated, ‘Yes you are right!’ 5 sheets. Reflections on a quarrel they've had; has also been called up, asks for information on his medical, and hopes they can get assigned to the same camp.
11 Nov. 1944 79 Brook Green, London, W.6. 2 sheets, with pen-and-ink drawing at top and tail of letter. Has nothing to write, encloses a book by Forester which will teach Peter to write economically; praises Richard Goolden and Helen Pollack [Ellen Pollock?] in "To True To Be Good".
Rest blank

Letter from Kendell Kardt
SHAF/A/1/K/1 · Pièce · 18 Aug. 1997
Fait partie de Papers of Sir Peter Shaffer

Is working as a ballet accompanist, asks if he is still teaching in England, is in touch with Joseph Chaikin, who is still busy despite the stroke that impaired his speech.

Cuttings of articles about Peter Shaffer
SHAF/A/5/1 · Pièce · 1958-2012
Fait partie de Papers of Sir Peter Shaffer

Includes profiles about both Peter and Anthony Shaffer, and Shaffer's article, "My three years in this grim and disgusting family business..." in the Evening Standard dated 14 Jan. 1972. There is also an entire issue of The Daily Mail for 9 June 1981, the Times 2 section of The Times for 18 May 2001, an entire issue of Theatregoer Magazine from 2001, and a letter from Derrick F. Mead of Peat Marwick dated 27 Feb. 1985 forwarding an article from The Sunday Telegraph magazine.

CLIF/A1/1 · Pièce · 20 Aug. 1864
Fait partie de Papers of W. K. Clifford

Trinity College, Cambridge.—Was sorry to hear of Uncle John’s death. Hopes Kitty (his sister) was not hurt much by the swing. Has heard from Mr Heywood and seen Tovey. Romilly has died.

—————

Transcript

Coll: SS: Trin: Cantab:
Aug: 20/64

My dear Papa and Mama

I was very sorry and surprised to hear of poor Uncle John’s death. It is no wonder that you are not well. You say he was well enough the Saturday before to go to Starcross {1} and stay with Aunt Lizzie. Is it not very like what one has heard of the flicker of a candle before it goes out? I remember having noticed it in other cases. It must be a consolation to think that he had no suffering during the week, and was conscious so long. And, if I may say anything of this kind, ought we to think that the mercy which we should ourselves accord can be greater than the Infinite mercy? It seems to take away all the benefit of the Incarnation, if the Compassion of our Lord is not at least as great as that of men.

I do hope dear little Kitty was not much hurt by the swing. I know it can knock very hard, because Clement hurt his knee there very much once. I have been scratching myself in bathing. About a fortnight ago I knocked my elbow against a rough post in diving, but it is nearly well now.

I have heard from Mr Heywood, who was in Paris on the 13th, and seems to be enjoying himself. Mrs Heywood is with him, and he says they have had delightful weather. I saw Tovey in a boat last night. You will see by the Paper that Mr Romilly, one of our Dons, has just died {2}.

Please to give my love to Mitchell, and say I hope he has not lost the opportunity of making interesting experiments as to the nature of physical pain. It is such a waste of trouble if he has.

With best love to all the little ones, and hopes that you are much better, believe me to remain

your very affectionate son
+W: K: Clifford.

P:S: I have at last borrowed a machine for mending pens, and my writing is rapidly improving under its influence. You should see the two awful tables of the Inequalities of the Moon’s Radius Vector and Longitude, which I have to read over every day, so as to get them by heart.

—————

On the back of the letter are two addresses in an unidentified hand: ‘W | 59 Cannon St | London’ (‘City’ struck through before ‘London’), and ‘2 Elm Grove | New North Rd’. The latter is an address in Exeter.

{1} A village in Devon, eight miles south-east of Exeter.

{2} Joseph Romilly died of heart failure on 7 August, while on holiday at Great Yarmouth.

Letter from W. K. Clifford to Lucy Lane
CLIF/A2/1 · Pièce · late Oct. 1874?
Fait partie de Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Place of writing not indicated.)—Thanks her for her long letter. Discusses arrangements for going to a play, and refers to his negotiations about the house. Mrs Sitwell has invited them to tea. Points out that they only need to understand each other to agree on what is important, and refers to his loneliness since losing ‘the only mind that had really grown up with my own’ (Crotch). Discusses in detail his views on Christianity.

(This letter was written some time between Crotch’s death on 16 June 1874 and Clifford's marriage on 7 Apr. 1875. The Sunday lecture referred to may have been ‘Body and Mind’, read before the Sunday Lecture Society on 1 Nov. 1874.)

—————

Transcript

20 pages! you sweet child—and a little bit over—all along of my telling you about my Sunday talks. First, thank you, darling, for sending me the Gibbon; though Sir Fred would not have minded waiting till I have taken my house, and then there would have been less to carry across. Next, I have secured miladi and Moss—Walter being away at his sweetheart’s—to go to the play with us tomorrow; and we are to dine there at 6 if I telegraph to that effect tomorrow morning after seeing you: because, as I said, uomo propone, donna dispone. Also I have written to the agent that my medical adviser Dr Corfield will come with me to inspect the house on Thursday, and asked if in the event of my taking it for 3 or more years the proprietor will either decrease the rent or let my holding commence at Xtmas. We must arrange somehow that you go and see your aunt while we elect members from 5 to 6, and then we must meet again somewhere. Have we made any arrangement about Sunday afternoon? Mrs Sitwell wants us to go to tea with her after my lecture. {1} She says she has met you and apologizes for the irregularity of the invitation, but will make a formal call first if you wish it. She has been working like a slave at the working women’s college and other excellent works.

Your letter made me very happy, darling; it is quite clear we only want to understand each other to agree on everything that is important; as for mere speculative opinions it is far better to have something left to discuss. You can’t conceive how lonely I have felt since I lost the only mind that had really grown up with my own; we never agreed upon results, but we always used the same method with the same object, which is much better. {2} It is only lately that I have seen other faces near me through the fog; have recognized how vast is the army that is all going the same way, and how rapidly the enemy is disappearing, though he does not know it. Now you won’t have time to read this tomorrow morning, but still I shall talk over one or two points.

First, a very small one. Your theory about the unconfessed feeling that the divine origin of Xt may be true, is not so far as I know a fact. It is of course very hard to realize that other people do actually honestly disbelieve what we believe ourselves; but no man that I know who has rejected Xtianity on moral grounds (and I know few men who have not) ever shews the slightest sign of such a doubt as you speak of, though I have had most confidential talks with a great many. There is, as you say, a vagueness about the character of Xt, a want of some definite action which can be called good or bad, which makes the ideal of him as exceedingly good to be more persistent when one has got it. But cutting away the impossible stories, and supposing some basis of truth in the healing of nervous diseases by strong excitement, one can say of him a little less than of Buddha, a little more than of Chrishna; nothing at all approaching to the definite heroism of Socrates, or Spinoza, or Mazzini. Buddha was an actual prince who left his throne to study the woes of poor people and find remedies for them; Chrishna stole cows, instead of killing pigs, that belonged to other people. These two claimed, like Christ, a supernatural mission, and worked miracles according to the earliest accounts we have. Why should I, a Teuton, hanker after one of these foreigners rather than the other? the Hindus are nearer to me by blood than the Jew; one has as many, the other twice as many followers, as he.

This is for me, who have ceased to believe in the supernatural goodness of Jesus. I fought hard for it; perhaps now have not courage to bear another such wrench as the losing of it gave me. But for you, darling, who still have that belief, keep it; a person of whom we really know so little is perhaps the safest sort of figure to clothe with your ideal. Only make up your mind that an increasing number of thoughtful people do sincerely think that person unworthy of your ideal.

But now let us admit that the rule of life which you read into the Gospels (as my friend Syed Ahmed Khan {3} reads all manner of enlightened things into the Koran) is really there; and even that Jesus is still alive and can hear you and help you carry it out. Then you say “won’t it be a good thing if some good is done for his sake that would not be done for the sake of ordinary men, out of sympathy and comradeship? And is it not quite natural and likely that he should have set apart certain men to preach this same doctrine, and have given them some of the same wonderful power?”

Here are two sets of things. 1. An excellent rule of life, and devotional affection for a certain person. 2. The substitution of the theological for the social motive, and the honouring of a set of men supposed to possess magical powers. The latter seem to follow naturally from the former; are they not then right things to do?

If the experiment had never been made, one might well answer, let us try. But the experiment has been made, at the cost of centuries of blood and fire and misery. If you love your brother for the sake of somebody else who is very likely to damn your brother, it soon comes to burning him alive for his soul’s health. That doesn’t seem likely, but it’s an observed fact. No Christian ecclesiastical body has ever had the power to persecute without using it. (It was once objected to me that some Quakers in Pennsylvania had the chance of persecuting their Indian servants and didn’t. But the Quakers have no clergy.) Before the clergy were recognized by the state they had destroyed the national sentiment all over the empire, and had sapped the foundations of social life with monasticism and the “theological motive.” Afterwards they got the hospitals suppressed and the physicians banished; substituting places where a martyr’s toe was brought to cure you, in a silver box. They shut up the philosophical & scientific schools. They they quarelled†. Ten million men were killed in the religious wars of Justinian and by the plagues which the relics were unable to stop. They suppressed all freedom of thought and therefore all progress. They respected not even the name of truth; for those frauds were called “pious” whose object was the honour of the Church. They reduced all Europe to a black night of barbarism which Greece had not known for two thousand years. And then when the light came, when the Teutons rose against her crimes and the Arabs exposed her falsehoods, the Church fought desperately over every inch of ground against the new civilization that was growing up; not only in Catholic but in Protestant countries. Even now the clergy howl against every new truth that is discovered, because the law will let them do nothing worse. They hinder the education of children, except in their own formulæ, knowing well that a straight conscience and a free-grown intellect will neither believe in their doctrines nor approve their precepts. There is the result of a fairly long experiment on the theological motive and the sacerdotal principle. If you put your hand in the fire and burn it tomorrow, and somebody comes on Thursday and says “see how nice and warm the fire is when your hand is outside; don’t you think it will be nicer and warmer if you put it in?” would you follow that person’s advice? The priesthood has destroyed one civilization. It has just failed to strangle another in its birth; and it is the bounden duty of every honest man to see that it shall never have another chance.

Well now, suppose that Christ is responsible for this; that he did knowingly let loose the Xtian clergy upon Europe. Then I say that no amount of diligence in preaching the Rabbis’ good precepts, no cure of some hundred or so paralytics and madmen in Palestine, can outweigh the atrocity of that awful crime. But if he is really alive now, was innocent, as I believe, of making priests, and represents your ideal; do you think his indignation is less against the “generation of vipers” than it was at Jerusalem? The language is strong, perhaps; the men are good in many respects, well-meaning; they only profess a little magic. All the more should our blood boil against the Institution that puts good men to such vile uses.

So, when our souls look back to thee
They sicken, seeing against thy side,
Too foul to speak of or to see
The leprous likeness of a bride,
Whose kissing lips through his lips grown
Leave their God rotten to the bone. {4}

There’s a sermon for you! Poor little thing, there is one comfort, that you won’t read it. Farewell, my own child; I shall see you at 11 tomorrow.

Willi.

—————

{1} The lecture was perhaps ‘Body and Mind’, read before the Sunday Lecture Society on 1 November 1874.

{2} Frederick Pollock (Lectures and Essays, i. 16) identified these words as referring to G. R. Crotch, who died at Philadelphia on 16 June 1874.

{3} Clifford presumably met Ahmad Khan when he visited England in 1869 and 1870.

{4} This is the thirtieth stanza of Swinburne’s poem ‘Before a Crucifix’.

† Sic.

CLIF/A6/1 · Pièce · 24 Mar. 1879
Fait partie de Papers of W. K. Clifford

33 Woodsome Road, Highgate Road, N.W.—Communicates the London Dialectical Society's regret at the death of Professor Clifford.

(Letter-head of the Society. Signed as Honorary Secretary.)

—————

Transcript

33 Woodsome Rd
Highgate Rd
NW
March 24/79

Madam

It is my mournful duty to send you a copy of the following resolution which was unanimously passed at a meeting of the Society held on the 19th inst.

“That this Society desires to express its deep regret at the loss sustained by the Nation through the untimely death of Profr Clifford the honored president of this Society: and tenders its sincere condolence to Mrs Clifford in her sad bereavement.”

I am
Yours very respectfully
Robt G. Hember
Hon Sec

Mrs Clifford

CLIF/E2/1 · Pièce · 1860s
Fait partie de Papers of W. K. Clifford

(This essay was probably written while Clifford was an undergraduate at Trinity.)

—————

Transcript

De statu scientiarum, quod non sit fœlix aut majorem in modum auctus; quodque alia omnino quam prioribus cognita fuerit via aperienda sit intellectui humano, et alia comparanda auxilia, ut meus suo jure in rerum naturam uti possit.

Bacon has an inconvenient habit of using old technical terms in entirely new senses, and of giving particular senses to general words which appear to have not the least connection with their ordinary meanings. For instance:—Form, Induction, Idol. We have other instances in the passage quoted above. “Scientiæ” does not mean a collection of facts or laws, but is more subjective, in accordance with the etymology. “Fœlix”, if affirmative, would mean that the sciences were easy, without inconvenient hitches and things hard to be understood. And “majorem in modum auctus” does not mean merely “increased” or “greatly advancing”, but denotes such an increase as changes the whole aspect of the science, or of some branch of it. In other words, it is a development of form and not of magnitude. The first clause, then, means that the sciences are perplexed with much the same general difficulties as they have been all along; that there has been no great clearing, which opened a wide surface to the feet of all walkers; and that this state of things is very unsatisfactory. In this sense we say that the clause is applicable to the present time. Admitting that the sciences generally are increased, that particular discoveries have been made, and the mechanical arts vastly improved—and indeed it could hardly be otherwise; admitting also, that the {1} state of certain particular branches of science has been auctus majorem in modum; we say that it still remains true, quod status scientiarum non sit majorem in modum auctus. There are still difficulties, and cramped methods; things do not flow on easily, except in some particular examples. Bacon’s idea of utilis inventio is not one that can be applied to mechanical arts (for there have been plenty of them), but one one that is ad generandum valida, capable of producing its like. For instance, the Chemical spectrum has already been the parent of many important discoveries, and there is no limit to the facts and laws which any one may discover by its means. Bacon’s method must be something general which corresponds to this special instance, and Induction, according to the common idea of the same, may have nothing whatever to do with it.

—————

Docketed by Clifford in ink ‘De Stato … | W K Clifford’, and by a later hand in pencil ‘Cambridge | early.’

{1} ‘the sciences … that the’: these three lines are marked in the margin with a vertical line and the comment ‘very good observn’. The comment probably relates specifically to the phrase ‘that particular discoveries … improved’.

CLIF/E4/1 · Pièce · 1866
Fait partie de Papers of W. K. Clifford

(Marked ‘Feb. 24th | 1 o’Clock’ and ‘very well read’. Clifford won joint first prize for this paper in the English Declamation competition at Trinity in 1866.)

—————

Transcript

On the Character of Sir Walter Raleigh.

Walter Raleigh was just twenty-four years old when he sat at breakfast in the Middle Temple, one morning in the year of our Lord a thousand five hundred and seventy six. I want you to look at him with me for a little while. For himself, he sits fairly upright; his build by nature is of good style, and it has marks of external training which proclaim the soldier. He sits facing the window, which looks down upon the rows of chrysanthemums, and beyond them to the Thames. On the walls hang arms and armour; the former have tasted blood, the latter the dint of steel. Yet it does not appear that the occupant of those rooms had no thought but for the battle. There are books; the books which found favour with Oxford and Cambridge then; not after all so very different from the books which find favour with Oxford and Cambridge now. I do not remember them all; there were Horace, and Ovid, and Virgil, and the like, all mingled strangely with the stars and the four elements, the forgotten lore of our forefathers, which we will not believe in. And there was North’s Plutarch, that wonderful book of heroes, with the leaves of the life of Cæsar much bethumbed and befingered, as if he who had read therein was apt now and then to forget that he was reading, and to muse. Nor yet have we seen the whole; in a little recess on his right hand there hung a crucifix against the wall; and near it—strange mixture—were a cloak and boots and sword that seemed to have been cast off hurriedly and without care. And this led me to look more narrowly upon the soldier’s face; where were signs not easily to be mistaken, in the eye, the rough brow, the languid and ill-contented look. Indeed, Raleigh was not exactly happy that day; and he shewed it.

But I have forgotten to mention that he had two companions. One was big, strong, and burly, somewhat like himself in body; with a massive jaw and fierce cruel eyes. The other was more slight and gentle of seeming; his face was kindly, and would force you to love and obey. For indeed he seemed the incarnation of mighty world-wide power, a spirit made to rule the hearts of men, to fill vast realms of moral space. Not so the first; his was the one brute will, as the strength of an unicorn, which ever commands present and visible success.

“That was a rare trick of yours, Walter, upon Master Charles Chester last night. I shall laugh till I die at the way he tried to open his mouth, when you had fastened his chin to his upper lip. Would that the whole community of fools were served so. Aha, these are great times for the soldier, truly. The world is all in an uproar; every man’s hand is against every man, and the weakest goes to the wall. Ay, and there is gold too to be had for the having; El Dorado is the right of the strongest. Make your way here, man; be but a good soldier of fortune, and gather like spirits around you; then will we away to the West, and be successful. Condé and Coligni were good schoolmaster enough; but they knew their own interests too well to be profitable servants. Is not the battle to the strongest, there as here? Does not the big boy always get the better of the little boy? And you and I, Raleigh, we are big boys; only let us play hard, and we are sure to win. Just think how great it will be to beat that crafty Spaniard at his own weapons! He has all the gold and the power now; but how did he get it? Exactly in the way I want you to take it from him. What is his right to the Indies? Just this; that he is stronger than all these puny men who cannot keep him back. If then we are stronger than he, we shall have the greater right. Fight, man, for gold and glory; and the devil take the hindmost.”

His sharp cruel eyes looked at Raleigh for a moment with an expression of the most intense affection, the most urgent entreaty; and Raleigh’s own seemed to answer with a sympathetic gleam. But he turned round and looked enquiringly at the youth on the other side of the table.

“It seems to me, Raleigh,” said he, “that when we went to France with Champernon, to fight under Condé for the rights of Navarre, we did so because it was the right cause:”—

“And a great deal we got by it,” interrupted the other. “Remember that day when we took shelter in Walsingham’s house, when the streets were full of the shrieks of the dying, and every hour brought in more and more of the widowed and the fatherless, crying to God and to us for safety and revenge. Remember that when you talk about the Right Cause. That’s what we get by it. To the true soldier one cause is as good as another, provided it turns out well.”

“Not to the soldier of God.” Here the big man began to wince a little. “It is surely happier to fail, nay, to die, on the side of the righteous, than to ride victorious at the head of the ungodly. Not now, but far away in the future, is the victory of good; he who would do right now must look for failure, visible, seeming failure, that he may share in the glorious triumph bye and bye. Who would not rather be the meanest that fell on that day in the streets of Paris, than Charles the Tenth {1} upon his bloody throne? Let us fight to conquer the Spaniard, the oppressor of mankind; not to wrest his gold from him, not to win from him at the sword’s point the sovereignty of the Indies; but to vindicate law and right upon the earth, to succour the poor from his oppressor, and the needy from him that spoileth him. The cause that we fought for was the cause of God, and every right cause is the same. There is only one battle upon the earth, now and ever; that battle is the fight between good and evil. The powers of evil ride on exulting in their strength, and seem to conquer; far greater and nobler is the victory which is won by the slain and the captive. All through Europe and the world the oppressor is gathering together his forces to the battle, that he may hush for ever the voice of justice and mercy, the voice that sings “Excelsior!” from the summit of the mount of God.”

He stopped for a moment; the big man was uneasy, and Ralegh looked puzzled. The expression of his face seemed to say “That is all very true, and in fact I knew it before; but I don’t exactly see how it bears upon the present case.” And the other, who had apparently taken advantage of this moment to consider a little, went on.

“Ralegh, you know very well that you are a great bully, and a coward. You are exceedingly conceited because you can write verses. Altogether, you are not an estimable kind of man.” Here he paused again.

“It is true that you have fought bravely. Did you do it yourself, or did you get the strength from outside? You have been merciful and gentle. You know how that was. You have written good words, which many shall feed upon hereafter. They were not your own words. O Prophet of the Lord, betray not your inspiration to the Evil One! Here is your true crusade, clear, definite, unmistakeable. Deus id vult!”

II.

Sixteen years went by. Sixteen years; a century to the life of a cabbage; a day, to the life of an oak.

Sir Walter Raleigh was walking in the gardens of Whitehall. He was certainly changed; yet not much; you could not help thinking that the man was wider. His appearance was toned down, more polished than before; his look more settled and satisfied. He wore a cloak which had once been brave and splendid; now it was much the worse for wear; the inside of it was stained with London mud, and yet he seemed to carry it proudly. But again he was not alone; a lady walked beside him, whose like you have all seen once, perhaps twice; not often. Her eyes were of that colour which the Greeks ascribed to Athênê; not that I can define either precisely, for they seem different to different men; but I am quite sure that that colour is not blue. Of the other features, nothing more can be said than that they were not beautiful. Not, that is, if you took each separately; for grave faults could be found in all. And yet no mortal man had ever denied that she was beautiful, nor do I. And Raleigh seemed to be of the same opinion with all the rest; for though every now and again his painter’s eye would rest critically upon a fault which seemed just then to spoil the entire effect, yet some sudden expression would light up the whole into radiant harmony, and the critical spirit would make way for unreserved worship, the natural right of all that is true and beautiful.

“You are a stranger to me, Sir Walter; I have not seen you for three days.”

“The queen’s business has been urgent of late.” He seemed to speak abstractedly, and to be thinking of something else. The lady was nettled.

“You are so fond of the queen, that I do not believe you care for me at all.”

“Who would not be fond of her?” said Raleigh with enthusiasm. “She is the greatest and best monarch that ever ruled men. Has she not delivered her own people, and many other peoples beside? What glory can compare with that which comes from the protected Flemings, the defeated Armada, the worshipping English? She stands alone with her people, triumphant over tyranny and wrong; and all because she is a right royal and a noble soul. I worship the very ground she treads on.” Here he lifted a certain portion of his cloak, and kissed it.

“That is true, Sir Walter, and I love her also,” said the lady, who seemed strangely satisfied with his reply. “But then, so much of her glory is also your own. It was you that most helped to crush Don John of Austria; you that discovered Virginia, and planted the queen’s name across the sea; you that truly advised, to the great destruction of the Spanish fleet.” And in saying this she blushed a little, as if she had been sounding her own praises. “And yet all this seems to me but a fair beginning. Surely it is not yet time to rest. You, who have done so much, can do much more. Should not the Spaniard be expelled from the Indies, root and branch? Should not El Dorado:—”

But here she stopped suddenly.

Two forms, like those we saw in that chamber in the Middle Temple, had been looking on. Not now in gross human shape, but as great etherial essences, floating like clouds above the sphere of men, unseen, but working. The dark one took great volumes of unhealthy smoke and pestilent vapours of fog and miasma, which rose from the great city, to mix with the pure air of heaven. And these he spread abroad, scowling fiercely the while. Then the bright spirit came and drew them away to the West, towards the setting sun; and there he made with them a glorious sunset, a scene like those which have fired poets and painters and prophets of all kinds in all ages to do honour to the wonderful works of God. The sky swept round from the north, a rosy sea, growing brighter and brighter towards the sun; and there were islands of purple and gold, darker and yet more glorious than the golden sea. And far and far away, long past the islands of purple, long past the islands of gold, beyond the rosy sea itself, there was El Dorado, right in the centre of the sun, glowing with gold, and gold, and gold! But, just above and just below the sea, and just to the south of the sun, there were great black masses of thick darkness, pierced here and there with furnaces of fire and blood, lurid and dreadful. Yet beyond all these was the great blue deep of the ether, looking down calmly on the whole world, clear, but not fathomed.

So Raleigh exclaimed suddenly, “Mistress Throgmorton, what a magnificent sunset!”

III.

Sixteen years more, and the Tower of London. Again Sir Walter Raleigh, and again the lady; she is now no longer Mistress Throgmorton, but Lady Raleigh. And beautiful yet;—you doubt, you smile unbelievingly. Ah then, you know not what true beauty is like; you never saw it, for it seemed to you but tame, and incomplete, and faulty. That material form which you worship for itself, in itself it will die; it contains no promise of a resurrection. Know that God made beauty for the outward and visible sign of the indwelling soul; it is one of the many tongues wherein He inspires men to teach their fellows. And to those who can read that language the beauty of man or woman is the beauty in which they will rise again! No wonder then that it is far above the reach of time; no wonder; for it shall last eternity.

And Raleigh, what of him? He bears the marks of those sixteen years, and they are deep marks. But his wounds are all in front. He has chosen the good cause, the cause of present failure, of final and glorious success. That motto which inspired his maiden sword has guided him on and on. Finem det mihi virtus. {2} So the old hero has the marks of his greatness about him; a greatness so vast, so imposing, that it is not even safe to let the crowd gaze upon him, lest they should catch the infection, and become great themselves. “Non sufficit orbis” said the proud Spaniard of his brute dominion, glorying in the plenitude of his material power; how low down he sinks when we weigh him against this mighty soul! Non sufficit orbis; no; the world’s tyrant is too small an enemy for him.

But what made him so great? Was it the expedition to Guiana, that great victory of justice and mercy, that blow to the Spanish power? Or was it the fight at Cadiz, the victory of true valour, the great overthrow of the oppressor? Or was it those years of private glory, when all men spoke well of him at home but those who would have stood immediately in his path? No, it was none of these. It was the long twelve years in the Tower of London; when all his schemes were foiled, when he was getting poorer and poorer every day, when the nation was falling down, down, far away from its high ideal, when the conquered Spaniard was repairing his losses by craft, and was helped by the very monarch who sat upon the English Throne; then, when all things looked blackest, and the evil one began to glory in his triumph and to say “I have conquered in the battle; with mine own arm have I gained this victory, and who is he that shall take it from me?”; then was the soul of Raleigh growing fast and faster to the full and perfect stature of a prophet of the Highest; preparing with painful discipline for that day when at last all hindrances should be overthrown, and he should go forth in freedom of spirit to fight the battle of the Lord.

Well, the twelve years were nearly over, and the refiner’s fire had all but done its work. Raleigh sat by a table, with a pen in his hand; a manuscript lay before him; it was the History of the World. Not finished, indeed; no good work of man ever is finished, for then it would cease to be good. All that we do here is worth only its incompleteness, only its promise of something to follow. So the History of the World was unfinished, and destined to remain so. And Raleigh looked up to his wife, who had watched him musingly as he wrote. “Oh husband,” she said, “I dreamt that you and I and Walter and Carew were all in El Dorado together, and that we sent home a whole shipload of gold for the people.”

I would shew you Raleigh once more; but I have not the eye of the eagle that can look the sun in the face. The battle of good and evil is going on still upon the earth; and it often seems to us as if the righteous side were losing ground. Then it is good for us to remember that the armies which we see with our mortal eyes are not the only combatants that are engaged in the fight; that besides the host of the Syrians, the enemies of Israel, that surround the mount, there is also the unseen army that defends us, so that they are more with us than with them. Ever above the clang of human contest, the hosts of light and darkness are warring in the clouds; nay, rather, in the thickest of the earthly fight. And when any of us is hard pressed, and seemingly at the mercy of the foe; then are we covered by the shields of the immortals, or caught up in a cloudy mist out of the hand of the enemy. In that great army of the twelve legions is the old soldier of England fighting still; from that Dorado does he send fine gold to his people who are still in the old country; now, more than ever, is that glorious motto true, Non sufficit orbis.

“But,” some will say, “that scene in the Tower was not the end of his life; you cannot reconcile this with what came afterwards.”

Know then, all ye who doubt, that the death of the Saints is enveloped in thick darkness, which seems to cover all the earth, and to hide even the face of God. And in this they grope about as blind men for awhile, suffering more than in all their lives before. But for those who have thus suffered there is needed no further purification; for the hour of death draws away the veil of darkness, and frees them to fulfil their glorious destiny. {3}

But what destiny?

Fighting still; on the same side, with the same objects, against the same foes. Now, as then, there is just in front of us a Dorado, meant for the good of all men, the gift of Him Who sends rain upon the just and upon the unjust. The student of science lives in the consciousness that at any moment that may be revealed to him which shall change utterly the whole face of society, and alleviate in an enormous degree the physical miseries of mankind. And now, as then, there is the danger lest that which is meant for the good of all should be perverted into an instrument of evil; lest, after all, the only result should be that another portion of conquered Nature is cursed for the sake of man.

Again: it is just as true now as it was then, that religion is impeded by her golden slippers. The political relations of Christianity have rent Christendom, and thrown doubt upon the Faith; they have furnished a religious pretext for the foulest of crimes.—

Ahi Constantin, di quanto mal fu matre,
Non la tua conversion, ma quelta dote
Che da te prese il primo ricco patre!

Let no man think that ecclesiastical oppression is dead, because it has advanced in refinement with the age. It is true that we have emancipated ourselves from the rule of the Western Patriarch; it is also true that we use our independence to define that which Christendom has never defined, and to condemn those whom Christendom has never condemned. The Twelve Legions are fighting hard for the reunion of the Churches; but they are also fighting against tyranny and wrong. Not by their help will that Union be effected, if it is to be nothing else than a conspiracy for the oppression of mankind. If then we want a definite cause, a crusade of righteousness to fight for; let us fight on the side of Raleigh and the Host of Heaven against intolerance and oppression, and brute force; so only shall we be fighting for the Faith, the freedom and the unity of Christians.

+W:K:C:

—————

Marked at the head in pencil ‘Feb. 24th | 1 o’Clock’. Docketed in pencil ‘Declamation’ and, above, ‘very well spoken’. Note the variation in the spelling of Raleigh’s name.

{1} ‘IXth’ has been added in pencil in the margin.

{2} Followed by ‘“I fight for the right and the true’ struck through in ink, and ‘“True and Righteous is the Issue”’ struck through in pencil.

{3} Followed by a cancelled paragraph, as follows: ‘“But the cause was bad;” say others. Raleigh fought for a false faith, against the Faith of Christ; how then is he a saint?”’

O./10a.40/1 · Partie · [1932 or earlier]
Fait partie de Manuscripts in Wren Class O

List of books - accounts, exit and redit books etc - with Wren Library reference numbers assigned to each. MS pencil note at top, '(Most) 1932 now in Muniment Room (behind Clock)'. Pencil annotations state which books remain in the Library, with the initials 'AH' [Arthur Halcrow?]. MS pencil note at bottom: 'Most of these volumes are stored in the Tower muniment room (behind clock). Nov. 1932 C.B.H. [Cecil Baldwin Hurry]'.

'The action of crystal rectifiers'
TAYL/C/1 · Dossier · c1910, 1976
Fait partie de Papers of Sir Geoffrey Taylor (G. I. Taylor)

Autograph ms., pages numbered 3-41, with a note by G.K. Batchelor, 'Found in G.I's garage in a water-stained folder, July 1976'.
Although the pagination begins p.3, the paper begins `Some months ago Sir J.J. Thomson suggested to me to try and find some explanation of the action of crystal rectifiers, and the experiments described in this paper are the results of this suggestion'. It seems therefore that the missing pages 1 and 2 did not include the substance of the paper.
Also included is correspondence re the paper between G.K. Batchelor and A.B. Pippard, 1976.

Family papers
MACR/1 · Dossier · 1865-[?]1937
Fait partie de Papers of Dame Rose Macaulay

Family background, letters, diaries and so on, original material 1865-1972, with copies of items dating from 1794 onwards.