Mostrar 82465 resultados

Descrição arquivística
4443 resultados com objetos digitais Mostrar resultados com objetos digitais
BABN/1 · Série · 1818-1847
Parte de Papers of the Babington family of Rothley Temple

Letters from Augusta Julia Babington, née Noel, to her father in law Thomas Babington.

Letter from C. S[?] B[abington?] to Mary Ellen Rose, née Parker. Letters from Catherine Babington, née Whitter, to her brother in law Thomas Babington. Letter from Charles Cardale Babington to his uncle Thomas Babington. Letters from Charles Edward Babington to his aunt Mary Parker, née Babington.

Letter from Charles Roos Babington to his sister Jean Babington; letters to his father Thomas Babington, and sister Mary Babington.

Letter from Elizabeth Babington, later Strange, to her uncle Thomas Babington. Letters from Frances Babington, née Sykes, to her sisters in law Maria Frances Babington (née Pratt) and Mary Parker (née Babington). This last includes a note from her husband Matthew Babington to his sister Mary.

'The Hintons visit English relatives'
TAYL/A/1 · Documento · [1924]
Parte de Papers of Sir Geoffrey Taylor (G. I. Taylor)

A 23 pp. typescript account by Carmelita Hinton (Taylor's cousin by marriage) with a ms. note 'Written for friends for Xmas 1924', and a ms. note by Batchelor 'Sent to Stephanie Ravenhill. Part 2 describes a cruise on "Frolic" with G.I.T. as skipper.'
The party included 'Aunt Maggie' (Taylor's mother), 'another cousin Ursula' [Nettleship, see A.161], a 'Dr. Adrian' [E.D. Adrian] and 'The O'Malleys' [see A.163].

Collection of anthems in score
Add. MS a/665/1 · Item · early 18th c.
Parte de Additional Manuscripts a

A volume of verse anthems by Blow, Clarke, Croft, Gibbons, Greene, Humfrey, Nares, Tudway, Turner, Weldon, and Wise, with two anthems by unidentified composers, and a trio sonata by Corelli.

An index pasted to the inside front cover has been written in a variety of hands, and lists some of the anthems in a different order and pagination. The paper is uniform, with 12 staves to a page. There appear to have been four principal copyists, professional or expert hands.

—————
p. 1: Mr Crofts, 'Praise the Lord, O my soul'
p. 14: Mr Crofts, 'I will sing unto the Lord'
p. 22: Mr Crofts, 'The earth is the Lords'
p. 35: Mr Wm Crofts, 'I will give thanks'
p. 57: Mr Crofts, 'Out of the deep'
p. 70: Mr Crofts, 'O Lord God of my salvation'
p. 81: Mr Crofts, 'I will allways give thanks'
p. 107: Mr Weldon, 'Ponder my words, O Lord'
p. 119: Dr Turner, 'Lord, who shall dwell in thy tabernacle'
p. 131: [Tudway], 'Thou O Lord hast heard our desire'
p. 142: Dr Turner, 'Lord thou hast been our refuge'
p. 150: Dr. Blow, P. H[umfrey], Dr T[urner], 'I will allways give thanks' (incomplete)
p. 169: Blow, 'I beheld and lo' (incomplete)
p. 185: Mr Green, 'Hear my prayer'
p. 197: Mr Weldon, 'Thou art my portion'
p. 207: Dr Blow, 'O sing unto God'
p. 218: James Nares, ['Have mercy on me']
p. 225: Dr Croft, 'Lord, what love have I'
p. 240: Crofts, 'I cryed unto the Lord'
p. 259: ——, 'The Lord is my light'
p. 268: ——, 'Whoso dwelleth' (incomplete)
p. 279: Mr Clark, 'The Lord is full of compassion'
p. 290: Mr Wise, 'Thou O God art praised in Sion'
p. 304: Mr Gibbons, ['Benedictus']
p. 308: Mr Gibbons, 'Creed'
p. 313: Corelli, 'Trio Sonata Op. 1/3'

'The action of crystal rectifiers'
TAYL/C/1 · Documento · c1910, 1976
Parte de Papers of Sir Geoffrey Taylor (G. I. Taylor)

Autograph ms., pages numbered 3-41, with a note by G.K. Batchelor, 'Found in G.I's garage in a water-stained folder, July 1976'.
Although the pagination begins p.3, the paper begins `Some months ago Sir J.J. Thomson suggested to me to try and find some explanation of the action of crystal rectifiers, and the experiments described in this paper are the results of this suggestion'. It seems therefore that the missing pages 1 and 2 did not include the substance of the paper.
Also included is correspondence re the paper between G.K. Batchelor and A.B. Pippard, 1976.

Card from J. B. Telfer to J. G. Frazer
Add. MS c/61/1 · Item · 13 May 1889
Parte de Additional Manuscripts c

Drayton Mansions, Drayton Gardens, S.W. - Forwards a [book? or the enclosed circular?] featuring his books 'The Crimea and Transcaucasia' and 'The Bondage and Travels of Johann Schiltberger' with quotations from the 'Saturday Review' and 'The Times' in the same hand on the front.

Copy of a telegram from Lord Reading to Edwin Montagu
MONT II/A/3/27/1 · Item · 25 Jan. 1922
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

(Official.) The Governor of Bombay [Lloyd] has recommended that Gandhi should be prosecuted immediately, and has sought the Governor-General [Reading]’s approval. The Governor thinks the main charge should be based on certain articles by Gandhi, particularly ‘A Puzzle and its Solution’, the object of which is to create disaffection against, and so overthrow, the Government. In reply, the Government of India have signified their general agreement with this view, but as they believe that Gandhi’s next move must involve a more direct challenge to the Government than any hitherto attempted, and as they wish to avoid the idea that Gandhi is being prosecuted because he has made a conference impossible, they suggest that prosecution should be deferred till after 31 January, when Gandhi will probably institute civil disobedience. They also prefer that prosecution should be based on more recent statements than those mentioned by the Governor. No fresh reference need be made to them before prosecuting, if Gandhi embarks on an active campaign of civil disobedience.

(Carbon copy.)

Telegram from Lord Reading to Edwin Montagu
MONT II/A/3/31/1 · Item · 4 Feb. 1922
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

Part 1. Reports the contents of a letter received from Gandhi describing the circumstances of the resolution taken at Bardoli to embark on mass civil disobedience, and urging the Viceroy to free non-co-operators imprisoned for non-violent activities, declare a policy of non-interference in all non-violent activities, free the press from administrative control, and restore the recently-imposed fines and forfeitures; if the Viceroy complies within seven days, civil disobedience will be postponed.

(Typed.)

Telegram from Lord Reading to Edwin Montagu
MONT II/A/3/39/1 · Item · 9 Feb. 1922
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

Refers to Montagu’s telegram of the 7th. Has stopped Lloyd coming to him, since it is essential that he should be at Bombay when action is taken. Lloyd has been in Kathiawar, and his health appears to have improved.

(Typed.)

Telegram from Lord Reading to Edwin Montagu
MONT II/A/3/41/1 · Item · 12 Feb. 1922
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

The Bombay Government will arrest Gandhi on 14 February, and Montagu can announce the arrest that afternoon. The Bombay lawyers have voted against taking action on the manifesto of 4 February or the Bardoli proceedings.

(Typed.)

MONT II/A/3/42/1 · Item · 14 Feb. 1922
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

(i) Refers to A3/46/3 and trusts that the Cabinet will understand his reasons for postpon-ing Gandhi’s arrest. The present situation is unclear, except that the resolutions show a great change in the non-co-operators’ attitude, which he attributes to a realisation of the danger and difficulties of carrying out civil disobedience. Reiterates his belief that civil disobedience is ‘the best battle-ground for us’, particularly this year, when the crops are good. Reports indicate dissension in non-co-operation ranks. His decision to postpone the arrest was influenced by a feeling that he could not risk the resignation of Sapru and other Indians, and that the division of the European and Indian elements in Council would be awkward at present, particularly with the Budget question before them. He has been advised that a general railway strike may take place when Gandhi’s arrest is announced, and that mill-hands in various centres will come out. Sapru says he will discover the real meaning of the latest move within two or three days, but believes that it means something ‘really good and lasting’ and that Indians generally regard it as a confession of failure by Gandhi.

(Typed. (ii) is a draft of A3/42/2.)

Copy of a letter from Edwin Montagu to Austen Chamberlain
MONT II/A/4/4/1 · Item · 5 Mar. 1917
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

24 Queen Anne’s Gate, S.W.— Thanks him for his letter explaining the position. He does not think the differentiation between cotton Customs and Excise Duties in India could ever be prevented, and as it has been done it does not matter. But he does not regard Interest and Sinking Fund of £100 million a year as a sufficient burden for India with her almost insignificant unproductive debt, and does not think India entitled to special consideration when compared with the burdens laid on other parts of the Empire. Points out that the increased pay of the Indian Army has been practically paid for by allowances for services abroad. Those who make cotton goods in India must, as a result of the differentiation, be allowed to increase the price of their goods. If the State protects any industry it ought to share in the profits, but the question with regard to cotton manufacture in India is very difficult. He wishes that it had been possible to make a policy for the whole Empire before dealing with it in India.

(Carbon copy.)

Letter from Lord Midleton to Edwin Montagu
MONT II/A/4/7/1 · Item · 4 Feb. 1918
Parte de Papers of Edwin Montagu, Part II

34 Portland Place, W.1.—Is sorry that what he said in the House should have disturbed Montagu in his travels. [He had apparently referred to criticisms of the India Office made by Montagu before he was made Secretary of State.] The reports Montagu received must have conveyed a different impression from the actual words of his speech. He admits that he was surprised that a man of Montagu’s calibre and experience should have criti-cised the India Office and the Indian Government so heavily, and believes that he would not now suggest that the Secretary of State should be more amenable to the Commons, which is a poor judge of Indian affairs. But he guarded himself against the suggestion that Montagu had any idea of becoming Secretary when he made the speech, and points out that it might be as-sumed from his appointment to that post not long afterwards that he had been sent there to give effect to the views he expressed. It was for this reason that the called the speech into question. Emphasises his desire to remain on friendly terms with Montagu and to co-operate with the Government. He has spent six months trying to assuage the situation in Ireland, but the old feuds have broken out again.