Showing 80617 results

Archivistische beschrijving
4377 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
PETH/8/120 · Stuk · 10 Oct. 1916
Part of Pethick-Lawrence Papers

10 Broad Walk, Buxton.—Comments on the presentation of spiritual union between men and women in fiction.

—————

Transcript

10. Broad Walk | Buxton
Oct 10. 1917.

Dear Mrs. Pethick Lawrence

Thank you for your fine letter. It’s a most awfully intricate and difficult subject, and maddening to make clear by letter. Poetry is such a different medium that I think it does not serve for analogy; and Rolland I don’t care for (unfashionable as that is). Do you know of any figure in fiction stretched to full spiritual growth, in any setting but that of tragedy. The nearest approach I know to the presentation of full spiritual union between man & woman in real art is Pierre & Natasha in Tolstoi’s War & Peace; and how very flat the ending of that great book is! The same may be said of Levin & Kitty in ‘Anna Karenin’! {1}

Henry James tried it in ‘A Portrait of a Lady’ but he left an ending which may be read either way; &, whichever way you read, it tells us nothing. Full spiritual development in happiness seems fated to be anti-climaxic, I suppose because it means Nirvana of which nothing can be said.

Some day we’ll talk about it perhaps.

Yours very sincerely
John Galsworthy

—————

{1} Closing inverted comma supplied.

Add. MS b/37/120 · Stuk · c 1947-c 1955
Part of Additional Manuscripts b

1 Brick Court, Temple, London, E.C.4. Dated 14 April 1919 - Makes recommendations of people to apply to: Mr Reeve Wallace about sugar, butter, and jam, and the Apothecaries Hall or the Pharmaceutical Society about analysing drugs; will be visiting [Sir Peter] Mackie.

Letter from George Airy
Add. MS a/200/120 · Stuk · 5 Nov. 1857
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Royal Observatory Greenwich - As far as GA remembers, WW quoted accurately from him concerning the old eclipses: 'and I was certainly correct: the only point on which change could be suspected (a point of no interest to the chronology) being that in the first paper I had left open the passage of Agathocles to the North or South of Sicily, inclining however to the North, but in the second paper I decide on the South'. There was some quibbling about another eclipse 'computed only from [Buachkardt's] elements, and is so stated in my first paper. It has since been computed with Hansen's elements (nearly as was described for Buackhardt's) far north of the sea of Azores. If this is the matter of which you were thinking I will send a note on it to the Athenaeum'. Were the quarrels at the BAAS meeting of 1857 or 1856?.

Letter from Charles Lyell
Add. MS a/208/120 · Stuk · 24 Mar. 1832
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

London - CL has just received a letter from Scrope [George Poulett Scrope] giving his opinion of CL's 'Principles of Geology', volume 2 and the review of it in the Quarterly Review [WW, Review of 'Lyell's 'Principles of Geology', volume 2', Quarterly Review, 1832]: 'Scrope is regarded by Lockhart, Murray and Co. as a first rate reviewer an opinion in which I fully coincide'. He thought the review was good and fair, and thought it by either Fitton [William Henry Fitton] or Greenough [George Bellas Greenough]. The most common complaint against CL's book is that the most original part - the extinction of species - is the least dwelt upon.