Showing 95252 results

Archival description
4485 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
FRAZ/18/105 · Item · 2 June 1938
Part of Papers of Sir James Frazer

7 Rue Lincoln VIIIe - Is pleased to hear of the success in Oxford, and that 'Anthologia Anthropologica' is selling well; discusses the displeasing article by van Gennep, reassures her he couldn't affect the reputation of Sir James, and the 'Mercure' is not the first authority in anthropology.

TRER/1/105 · Item · 28 July 1925
Part of Papers of Robert Calverley Trevelyan and Elizabeth Trevelyan

37 Weetwood Lane, Leeds. - Is glad Trevelyan approves of the book ["The Idea of Great Poetry"?] in the main; is in the middle of "Thamyris" [Trevelyan's "Thamyris: or, Is There a Future for Poetry?"] and finding it excellent. The Abercrombies go to Anglesey tomorrow but will be back before the 16th and delighted to have Trevelyan with them.

Letter from Keith Baxter
SHAF/B/11/1/105 · Item · 18 Oct. 1983
Part of Papers of Sir Peter Shaffer

Went to see 'Amadeus' in Chichester, as Paul [Scofield] had finished at the National before his return to England; admires the production, directing by Paul Giovanni and acting by Keith Michell.

Letter from John Herschel
Add. MS a/207/105 · Item · 8 May 1862
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Collingwood - JH has not been working much on his translation of Homer's 'Iliad'. He will not be attending the BAAS meeting in October: 'that sort of thing is more than I can face now'. De Morgan has sent him a spoof of the opening of book one of the 'Iliad' [JH encloses a copy].

Add. MS a/215/105 · Item · 20 Sept. 1851
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

WW is pleased to hear that JCH is much better. WW wants him to cast his thoughts back to etymologies: 'You will still recollect with pleasure our old Etymological Society of (I think) 1832, though so many of the members have been called away from this world of words to the realities beyond the grave. I want to send a few memoranda respecting that Society to the existing Philological Society of London' [Philological Society, No. 117, Vol. V, Feb. 20, 1852].

Add. MS a/202/105 · Item · 5 Oct. 1846
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

7 C. St. & T. - Acknowledges receipt of Whewell's paper. Whewell's 'conception of objective must be subjective, these words make a crabbed question'. De Morgan would like nothing more than 'to give impulse to the making of words - if I were etymologist enough'. He has always liked the phrases 'vitreous and resinous electricity - they express one fact and no theory'. He thinks 'retinal and radial' would do to describe 'the action of rays on the retina, as an easily perceptible instance of an external agent and a produced condition'. If we admit objective 'is it likely that the ordinary antithesis of language should express an antithesis which people in general never think of'. He thinks 'objective and reflective might be made to do - but the idea we want is not that of turned back, but roused by means of, state produced by the suggestion of'.