Showing 80617 results

Archival description
4377 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
Letter from Henry Holland
Add. MS a/206/117 · Item · 21 Mar. [1840]
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

HH returns three proof sheets to WW with his comments [presumably WW's 'Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History', 2 vols., 1840]. He would like to see more English names in physiology and less foriegn ones. HH will supply WW with the names of more English physiologists of a modern date if required.

India (1989)
EPST/D/19/117 · File · 5 Dec. 1988–31 Jan. 1989
Part of Papers of Sir Anthony Epstein

Visit of the Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society to India and attendance of the Seventy-Sixth Session of the Indian Science Congress, Madurai, January 1989

Add. MS a/213/117 · Item · 14 Mar. 1840
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

WW does TPT's 'little books (as the French say) too much honour, in expecting from it any novel presentations of the fundamental relations of space [see his 'Geometry without Axioms. Or the First Books of Euclid's Elements', 1830]...It professes only to stand upon the fact, that the intercepted portion of the radius vector in the Equiangular Spiral is finite (or as has been preferred to call it, limited), for any limited number of revolutions; and this in defiance of the truth or untruth of Euclid's axiom on Parallels'. However the method has 'no more claim to be a novel presentation of the fundamental relations of space, than if the fact had been that, through some oversight of everybody else, it had turned out to be as easy to prove that the three angles of a triangle cannot be less than two right angles, as it is to prove they cannot be greater' [see his 'Theory of Parallels: the Proof that the Three Angles of a Triangle are Equal to Two Right Angles', 1853]. TPT made the distinction between higher and lower geometry 'merely as what exists in language. But I suppose the distinction intended is, that the higher geometry involves the method of infinitesimals or infinitely small parts, which Euclid has ably and successfully evaded by his introduction of a sum to be approached to within less than any magnitude assigned. At the same time I cannot conceal my wish, that the demonstration (supposing it always to be one) had been brought within the narrower pale'.

PETH/8/117 · Item · 12 Oct. 1916
Part of Pethick-Lawrence Papers

Millthorpe, Holmesfield, near Sheffield.—Declines to join the National Council for Adult Suffrage, and explains why.

—————

Transcript

Millthorpe, Holmesfield, near Sheffield
12 Oct 1916

Dear Mrs. Pethick-Lawrence

Do excuse my long delay in replying to yours of the 28th ult:, but I find it very difficult to keep up with my correspondence!

Of course I remember you very well and have often wished to meet you again, but our paths do not often cross.

With regard to the Adult Suffrage question, though I certainly favour it for Men in this Country I am quite doubtful whether it is wise to open the Vote out so rapidly & suddenly for Women—who so far have had little or no experience in the matter, and of whom we have so little experience as to how they will act. Considering the enormous preponderance of Women in numbers, combined with the fact that the mass of women at present (and in this Country) are so easily swept up, as one’s experience shows, by any specious and glib-tongued man(!)—as by clergymen, ministers, titled folk and the like—and might easily with a little scheming be taken in flocks to the polls—I think the experiment on the proposed scale is at least a little rash.

Of course I am speaking of the working class women I know, up here in the North, and of the middle class women generally. What I say does not apply to the ‘advanced’ women—but then what proportion are they of the population—1/10th or 1/100th or 1/1000th?

I should feel quite differently in the U.S. for instance where the general level of alertness & education is greatly different from here; and I have a good hope that even here the rising tide may make the universal suffrage feasible in what people call “the near future”—but you see I am cautious, and think we ought to hasten slowly.

At any rate you understand that though I appreciate much the invitation to join the National Council for A.S. I do not feel at present disposed to do so. Though I wish the movement all success—esp[ecia]lly in its educative rôle—I do not feel drawn just now to give my time & energy to it.

Excuse my rather hasty & halting explanations, and with the expression of my gratitude to you for the good work you are doing in the cause of Democracy—believe me

Yours very sincerely

Edw[ar]d Carpenter

—————

Letters omitted from words abbreviated by superscript letters have been supplied in square brackets.

Add. MS b/37/117 · Item · c 1947-c 1955
Part of Additional Manuscripts b

Hotel Lutetia, 43 Boulevard Raspail, Paris. Dated 16th. March 1919 - The death of Lilly's daughter [Lilly Grove] has been a heavy blow; wonders when he will leave on his expedition [to Uganda] and hopes he met with Sir David Prain.

MAYR/B/8/117 · Item · 3 Oct 1823
Part of Mayor Papers

Wesleyans have been asked to preach at Galle, has tried to persuade natives to attend church but most prefer their ancient customs, Mrs Knight likely to be an influence on the poor women: Nellore

Add. MS b/35/117 · Item · c 1947-c 1955
Part of Additional Manuscripts b

'Kinawanua' Gordon N.S.W. Dated May 7th 1912 - Is sending notes he made while reading Frazer's book on Taboo [not transcribed]; is also forwarding a copy of a paper in which he disagrees with Frazer's theory [on totemism, not transcribed].

Letter from Henry Brougham
Add. MS a/201/117 · Item · 26 July 1847
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Thanks WW for his kind letter and hopes he really can do something for him [one of the candidates for the Professorship at St. Andrews in Natural Philosophy]. The evidence [for the discovery of Neptune] is decisively in favour of John Couch Adams.

Add. MS c/93/117 · Item · 20 Feb 1879
Part of Additional Manuscripts c

Reports that her illness is preventing her from seeing any of her friends. Expresses her desire to 'institute some sort of Educational instrumentality which will be a help to poor students of the subjects in which [her] husband was most interested...to be called by his name.' Seeks advice on this project from Sidgwick and Professor [James?] Stuart. Refers to a report in the Times on the meeting on University Teaching at the Mansion House, and concludes that a greater knowledge of the work of the London Society for the Extension of University Teaching would assist her in her plans. She intends to devote four or five thousand pounds to the purpose. Asks Sidgwick to discuss the matter with Professor Stuart, and with 'any Cambridge man' whom he thinks likely to 'aid with ideas'; mentions Michael Foster as an example. Refers with affection to a letter she received from Sidgwick. Sends her 'best love' to Mrs Sidgwick, and expresses the desire to carry out the project during her lifetime, and not as a matter of bequest.

Cross, Marian (1819-1880), née Evans, author, pseudonym George Eliot
WITT/MS/117 · Item · 11 Sep 1937–Aug 1938, 3 Feb–16 Jun 1940
Part of Papers of Ludwig Wittgenstein

Notebook containing a number of distinct parts. The first portion on the philosophy of mathematics overlaps with pp 110 to 126 which contain 3 early drafts for the Philosophical Investigations. pp 148 to 273 are a continuation of ms 122. There are a few coded remarks at the end,