Item 67 - James David Forbes to William Whewell

Identity area

Reference code

Add. MS a/204/67

Title

James David Forbes to William Whewell

Date(s)

  • 27 May 1845 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

5 pp

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Portree, Skye - JDF has accepted James Challis's invitation to Cambridge Observatory. He is pleased that WW formed a favourable opinion of his article on William Hopkins [see JDF to WW, 27 Apr. 1845]. 'You ask about our university Tests. As on all similar subjects men's minds seem to be undergoing a curious revolution on this.The result of the late discussions in our senate surprised me excessively. From the first I had resolved to take no part in it whatever. As an episcopalian I felt too much interested in the removal of them to trust myself to vote on that side; my prepossessions being certainly favourable to some species of test generally...every Professor present including old Presbyterians, Freechurchmen, Lawyers, several conservatives, and all the Episcopalians, voted for the removal of the Tests, except the Principal (Lee) and myself who did not vote...This curious result satisfied me that the minds of moderate sensible men in Scotland attached to Presbyterianism are in favour of the removal of the Tests which in our University at least have so long been nominal'. JDF is pleased WW likes his paper on the eye [On a Possible Explanation of the Adaption of the Eye to Distinct Vision at Different Distances, Trans. of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1845, see JDF to WW, 5 March 1845].

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area