Item 30 - Letter from H. A. Woodham

Identity area

Reference code

Add. MS a/55/30

Title

Letter from H. A. Woodham

Date(s)

  • 27 Feb. 1852 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

4 folded sheets

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

50 Hills Road - Thanks Whewell for his 'Of a Liberal Education in General...3: The Revised Statutes 1851-1852'. The 'University of Cambridge cannot be the only corporate body in the Kingdom incapable of self government. I think that the restrictions on its rights imposed in the 16th cent. does operate greatly to its damage. I think that no College office should confer University privilege; that all authority should emanate really, as it does nominally, from the Senate, & that no influence should exist in that body except such as personal merits might serve'. The 17 heads of college have far too much influence: they nominate almost every office in the Senate - such a distribution of power leads to two parties. The opinion of these heads substitutes for the opinion of the whole body. Woodham gives a long critique on the non-representative nature of the office of Vice-Chancellor, and agrees that 'the Senate absolutely requires a Council, Committee, or "Caput" charged with some such functions as the Caput now existing, but I consider that in the constitution of this Council, such regard should be had to prudence, wisdom & experience, as would exclude from the permanent possession of one third of its places a small body of college officers "not necessarily distinguished" for either'.

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area