Stuk 2 - Telegram from Lord Chelmsford to Edwin Montagu

Identificatie

referentie code

MONT II/A/2/27/2

Titel

Telegram from Lord Chelmsford to Edwin Montagu

Datum(s)

  • 21 Mar. 1920 (Vervaardig)

Beschrijvingsniveau

Stuk

Omvang en medium

Context

Naam van de archiefvormer

Geschiedenis van het archief

Directe bron van verwerving of overbrenging

Inhoud en structuur

Bereik en inhoud

Has read the report and discussed it informally with colleagues, though it will not be considered in Council till next week. His provisional opinion is that they should endorse the findings of the majority report. It is regrettable that the cleavage of opinion was so radical as to make two reports necessary, but there is much common ground. The main difference relates to the question of whether martial law was necessary, but by accepting the majority findings regarding the number of outrages, the animus of the rioters, etc., the minority have, he thinks, undermined their case. The minority also condemn more vehemently such incidents as the Jallianwala Bagh firing. With regard to this incident they [the Government of India] will probably endorse the majority opinion, though Chelmsford is prepared to go further and say that General Dyer’s action in fact checked a dangerous rising against Government. As regards action to be taken, the main problem is the case of Dyer. Chelmsford accepts the majority view that at Jallianwala Bagh he acted beyond what a reasonable man would think necessary, and without humanity. He should therefore be asked or compelled to retire, and since he is in poor health and not considered fit for promotion he will probably want to do so. It is not incumbent on the Government to prosecute him, but if he is prosecuted privately they must remain neutral. Dyer did himself scant justice in his evidence by excusing or mitigating nothing and exaggerating some points, and if he was wrong to consider himself responsible for the state of the province, he was justified in considering the position in the area under his command. Believing, correctly, that Amritsar was in a state of rebellion, he thought that the gathering [at Jallianwala Bagh] was the beginning of an influx of outsiders which might have resulted in general looting and the killing of Europeans. The Punjab Government should be asked to take disciplinary action against the other officers whose conduct is blamed.

(Typed. Continued in A2/27/4.)

Waardering, vernietiging en slectie

Aanvullingen

Ordeningstelsel

Voorwaarden voor toegang en gebruik

Voorwaarden voor raadpleging

Voorwaarden voor reproductie

Taal van het materiaal

    Schrift van het materiaal

      Taal en schrift aantekeningen

      Fysieke eigenschappen en technische eisen

      Toegangen

      Verwante materialen

      Bestaan en verblifplaats van originelen

      Bestaan en verblijfplaats van kopieën

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Aantekeningen

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Trefwoorden

      Onderwerp trefwoord

      Geografische trefwoorden

      Naam ontsluitingsterm

      Genre access points

      Identificatie van de beschrijving

      Identificatiecode van de instelling

      Toegepaste regels en/of conventies

      Status

      Niveau van detaillering

      Verwijdering van datering archiefvorming

      Taal (talen)

        Schrift(en)

          Bronnen

          Voorwaarden voor raadpleging en gebruik