Item 95 - James David Forbes to William Whewell

Identity area

Reference code

Add. MS a/204/95

Title

James David Forbes to William Whewell

Date(s)

  • 30 Aug. 1850 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

1 doc

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Phesdo by Laurencekirk, N.B. - After he left Kissingen [see JDF to WW, 19 June 1850] he went to Switzerland. He saw Studer, von Buck and Charpentier, and had two 'capital days' of glacier walking. On his return to Edinburgh he was seized 'with a painful sort of bilious attack, which confined me to bed for 2 days'. The BAAS meeting was thus an uphill struggle although he managed to enjoy the last few days: 'on the whole I observed a good deal of surrender of personal feeling to the general cause of harmony on the occasion'. JDF gave another version of his paper on the application of probabilities to double stars ['On the Alleged Evidence for a Physical Connexion between Stars forming Binary or Multiple Groups, arising from their Proximity Alone', London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, August 1849]: 'Mature consideration and conversation with others has satisfied me completely, that Mitchell's famous reasoning about double stars, the Pleiades etc - so far as founded on the calculation of probabilities is utterly baseless. Herschel has written a review in the Edinburgh (last no.) in which at page 34 (I think) he tries to answer my objections, but in fact gives the real question at issue the go by altogether' [see JDF to WW, 20 Oct. 1849].

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area