Item 19 - Letter from F. H. Fobes to R. B. McKerrow

Identity area

Reference code

Add. MS a/355/4/19

Title

Letter from F. H. Fobes to R. B. McKerrow

Date(s)

  • 9 Jan. 1928 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

1 single sheet

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Box 561, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.—Offers a solution to a technical difficulty referred to in An Introduction to Bibliography in connection with the two-colour process. Is puzzled by the locative ‘Parisius’ (cf. Add. MS a. 355/4/25).

—————

Transcript

F. H. Fobes. | Box 561 | Amherst | Mass.
Amherst College, Amherst, Mass.,
January 9, 1928

Ronald B. McKerrow, Esq.,
C/o The Clarendon Press, Oxford,

My dear Sir:

I have read with much interest your Introduction to Bibliography. May I make a suggestion about the two-color process which you discuss on pp. 335-6? The ‘technical difficulty’ which you suggest in your note on p. 336, though I have found from my own experience as an amateur that it is real, can, I think, be obviated by using strong, heavy paper for the mask and by cutting it carefully. I suspect that a more serious difficulty arises from the shrinkage of the moistened paper: if the proportion of red to black is small and the red is printed first, a slight shrinkage may make it difficult or, in work set solid, impossible to secure perfect register without remoistening; whereas if the black is printed first it is generally possible, without too much labor, to alter the position of the ‘red’ words in the forme to allow for even a serious shrinkage.

If you have any information about the origin of the locative ‘Parisius’, which has often puzzled me and which seems not to [be] dealt with in the ordinary books on palaeography, I should be most grateful to receive it. {1}

Very truly yours,
Francis H. Fobes

—————

Typed, except signature, and the name and address in the first line. McKerrow has written at the head ‘ans [i.e. answered] 29 Feb 28’.

{1} McKerrow consulted the British Museum on this point. See Add. MS. 355/4/25.

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area