Item 6 - Telegram from Edwin Montagu to Lord Chelmsford

Identity area

Reference code

MONT II/A/2/27/6

Title

Telegram from Edwin Montagu to Lord Chelmsford

Date(s)

  • 30 Mar. 1920 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

Context area

Name of creator

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Is unwilling to decide what action should be taken on the Hunter Report before it has been discussed in Cabinet and a Cabinet Committee has been appointed. At present he lacks the material to lay before a Committee, as he only has the copy of the report brought by Williams.; moreover, everyone is going away for Easter and he could not get a Committee formed before Parliament reassembles in two weeks. Reuter has telegraphed a summary of the Congress Report, and he fears that comments on it in the London press will cause trouble in India. On the other hand he strongly believes they should not publish the Hunter Report in India before it is published in England, nor before they have agreed and decided on all matters aris-ing from it. The Congress have apparently pointed out that Montagu ordered the postponement of the executions of those who were appealing to the Privy Council, and have made this the subject of a charge against Chelmsford. He is anxious to know how the Congress Committee learnt of this difference of opinion. Assures him of his sympathy.

(Typed, with handwritten alterations. Used for transmission.)

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area