Unidad documental simple 1a - Copy of a letter from R. B. McKerrow to R. W. Chapman

Área de identidad

Código de referencia

Add. MS a/355/6/1a

Título

Copy of a letter from R. B. McKerrow to R. W. Chapman

Fecha(s)

  • 14 July 1939 (Creación)

Nivel de descripción

Unidad documental simple

Volumen y soporte

1 single sheet

Área de contexto

Institución archivística

Historia archivística

Origen del ingreso o transferencia

Área de contenido y estructura

Alcance y contenido

Picket Piece, Wendover, Bucks.—Repeats his suggestion that the lectures on elementary bibliography he gave at King’s College, London, might make a useful introductory book.

(Typed transcript. The original was sent to R. W. Chapman with the original of Add. MS a. 355/6/1a and the text of ‘Elements of Bibliography’ (perhaps Add. MS a. 355/6/2b).)

—————

Transcript

COPY

Picket Piece, Wendover, Bucks.
14th July 1939.

Dear Chapman,

You may remember that when I saw you at Oxford in March, or thereabouts, I mentioned a short series of lectures on very elementary bibliography that I had been in the habit of giving at King’s College, London, for many years past and that I thought might, if printed, be a useful introduction for people who don’t want to go far with the subject, and also perhaps for the beginnings of librarianship course (most of which are said to be very bad—far from clear and too full of detail). The stuff had become unreadable through much alteration, and so I had it typed. The idea is that if you think there is the making of a little book in the lectures (price 4/- or so), I will take them away when I go for a holiday and see about improving them—the stuff can mostly be done without books. It could be done very quickly if I felt like it, and would not interfere with anything else. The main point is (if you think it worth publishing)—should the lecture style be entirely abolished, i.e. should I turn ‘Always be careful not to mix up …’ into ‘Care should be taken not to confuse …’ or ‘to differentiate between …’ Personally I see no harm in the former. Of course one has to explain a lot that one makes clear in a lecture by showing things, but I think I have already put in most of these necessary explanations.

If you don’t want the stuff, do you think that publication elsewhere could damage your rights in the ‘Introduction to Bibliography’? I dare say Sidgwick and Jackson would do it if you would rather not, but of course this would only be if you did not think it could harm the larger book.

I need hardly say that if you approve of the book in general I should be very glad of any comments or suggestions for improvement.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed) R. B. McKerrow

P.S. | Just going to Cliftonville for a fortnight (for health, no other reason!). Am not well, but think I now see a chance of improvement, perhaps cure.

—————

At the head is the reference ‘P.12977’.

Valorización, destrucción y programación

Acumulaciones

Sistema de arreglo

Área de condiciones de acceso y uso

Condiciones de acceso

Condiciones

Idioma del material

    Escritura del material

      Notas sobre las lenguas y escrituras

      Características físicas y requisitos técnicos

      Instrumentos de descripción

      Área de materiales relacionados

      Existencia y localización de originales

      Existencia y localización de copias

      Unidades de descripción relacionadas

      Descripciones relacionadas

      Área de notas

      Identificador/es alternativo(os)

      Puntos de acceso

      Puntos de acceso por materia

      Puntos de acceso por lugar

      Tipo de puntos de acceso

      Identificador de la descripción

      Identificador de la institución

      Reglas y/o convenciones usadas

      Estado de elaboración

      Nivel de detalle

      Fechas de creación revisión eliminación

      Idioma(s)

        Escritura(s)

          Fuentes

          Área de Ingreso