Item 1a - Copy of a letter from R. B. McKerrow to R. W. Chapman

Zona de identificação

Código de referência

Add. MS a/355/6/1a

Título

Copy of a letter from R. B. McKerrow to R. W. Chapman

Data(s)

  • 14 July 1939 (Produção)

Nível de descrição

Item

Dimensão e suporte

1 single sheet

Zona do contexto

História do arquivo

Fonte imediata de aquisição ou transferência

Zona do conteúdo e estrutura

Âmbito e conteúdo

Picket Piece, Wendover, Bucks.—Repeats his suggestion that the lectures on elementary bibliography he gave at King’s College, London, might make a useful introductory book.

(Typed transcript. The original was sent to R. W. Chapman with the original of Add. MS a. 355/6/1a and the text of ‘Elements of Bibliography’ (perhaps Add. MS a. 355/6/2b).)

—————

Transcript

COPY

Picket Piece, Wendover, Bucks.
14th July 1939.

Dear Chapman,

You may remember that when I saw you at Oxford in March, or thereabouts, I mentioned a short series of lectures on very elementary bibliography that I had been in the habit of giving at King’s College, London, for many years past and that I thought might, if printed, be a useful introduction for people who don’t want to go far with the subject, and also perhaps for the beginnings of librarianship course (most of which are said to be very bad—far from clear and too full of detail). The stuff had become unreadable through much alteration, and so I had it typed. The idea is that if you think there is the making of a little book in the lectures (price 4/- or so), I will take them away when I go for a holiday and see about improving them—the stuff can mostly be done without books. It could be done very quickly if I felt like it, and would not interfere with anything else. The main point is (if you think it worth publishing)—should the lecture style be entirely abolished, i.e. should I turn ‘Always be careful not to mix up …’ into ‘Care should be taken not to confuse …’ or ‘to differentiate between …’ Personally I see no harm in the former. Of course one has to explain a lot that one makes clear in a lecture by showing things, but I think I have already put in most of these necessary explanations.

If you don’t want the stuff, do you think that publication elsewhere could damage your rights in the ‘Introduction to Bibliography’? I dare say Sidgwick and Jackson would do it if you would rather not, but of course this would only be if you did not think it could harm the larger book.

I need hardly say that if you approve of the book in general I should be very glad of any comments or suggestions for improvement.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed) R. B. McKerrow

P.S. | Just going to Cliftonville for a fortnight (for health, no other reason!). Am not well, but think I now see a chance of improvement, perhaps cure.

—————

At the head is the reference ‘P.12977’.

Avaliação, seleção e eliminação

Incorporações

Sistema de arranjo

Zona de condições de acesso e utilização

Condições de acesso

Condiçoes de reprodução

Idioma do material

    Script do material

      Notas ao idioma e script

      Características físicas e requisitos técnicos

      Instrumentos de descrição

      Zona de documentação associada

      Existência e localização de originais

      Existência e localização de cópias

      Unidades de descrição relacionadas

      Descrições relacionadas

      Zona das notas

      Identificador(es) alternativo(s)

      Pontos de acesso

      Pontos de acesso - Assuntos

      Pontos de acesso - Locais

      Pontos de acesso de género

      Identificador da descrição

      Identificador da instituição

      Regras ou convenções utilizadas

      Estatuto

      Nível de detalhe

      Datas de criação, revisão, eliminação

      Línguas e escritas

        Script(s)

          Fontes

          Área de ingresso