Item 34 - Letter from [G.] Z. M[ ] to Henry Sidgwick

Identity area

Reference code

Add. MS c/104/34

Title

Letter from [G.] Z. M[ ] to Henry Sidgwick

Date(s)

  • 28 May 1892 (Creation)

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

1 doc

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Acknowledges receipt of Sidgwick's 'kind note and the copy of the University Reporter which accompanied it.' Writes in relation to the question of the institution of French and German in the Previous Examination. While stating that it would be useless to discuss the theoretical question of a classical as opposed to a modern, 'or what is "called" Modern Education', declares that he believes that a classical education is better. States, however, that modern departments of schools must become an increasingly important element, so long as they do not swallow up the classical departments.

King's College School has lately sent several boys up [to Cambridge], 'with very considerable success'; predicts that others will soon be following their example, but believes that many boys who are capable of distinguishing themselves in mathematics or science could also go up, 'if the knowledge of languages could be accepted as it stands, and they were not required to do Greek.' Suggests that they could present Latin, German and French, while their friends 'on the Classical side could present Greek, Latin, and French'. Thinks that it would be '[ ] to be able to push these boys well on with Latin, French, German, and Mathematics and send them up [ ] the Universities, instead of to Tutors in or about London.' Adds that he does not think that the numbers seeking exemption from Greek would at any time be very large at the Previous Examination, but does believe that to those seeking it 'the Scheme would be a matter of much importance', and that it would enable them still 'to [connect] important divisions of [their] schools with the universities' and to give the boys a definite external standard. Concludes that he sympathises with the arguments on the other side, but 'facts are facts.'

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Notes area

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area