Item 31 - Letter from J. F. Payne to Henry Sidgwick

Explains that Sidgwick's note was forwarded to him, and hopes that he understands the delay. Discusses the 'passable candidates' for a post referred to by Sidgwick. Claims that because of the size of the remuneration, he would get 'the pick of all the scientific men who have not any Professorship or similar appointment, provided other conditions suited.' Believes that the multiplicity of subjects to be taught could cause problems. Lays down who he believes are the actual classes of men 'who might become candidates'; [assistants] to professors, especially to [professors] of chemistry; medical men who have made a special study of some branch of science; '[G]eologists who have been educated at the school of [mines] and either are or have been employed on the Geological Survey'; Oxford and Cambridge men. Refers to academical degrees and claims that 'the only ones of any value in this respect are German degrees and the Science degrees of the University of London.' Discusses the difference between a B.Sc. and a D.Sc. Claims that he could mention individuals 'who have only lately got appointments elsewhere and who would have jumped at [the] office a short time ago'.

Believes that 'any one of the great scientific men who lives by his [ ] would have thought himself very lucky to get such a place [by] the age of 30, eg. Huxley, Tyndall etc.' Predicts that if Sidgwick advertises the post he will be certain to get a great many applications 'unless some great names should be put forward.' Thinks that Geology 'will be the rarest accomplishment as it is really rather a pursuit than a science or at any rate, it is the application of several sciences.' Thanks Sidgwick for sending Swinburne, and declares that he is glad Sidgwick's weight 'is on the side of the party who can admire even while holding their noses.'